--- a/rdf-schema/index.html Tue Nov 05 16:55:51 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-schema/index.html Tue Nov 05 17:16:51 2013 +0100
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
// if there is an earler version of this specification at the Recommendation level,
// set this to the shortname of that version. This is optional and not usually
// necessary.
- prevRecShortname: "rdf-concepts",
+ // prevRecShortname: "rdf-concepts",
// editors, add as many as you like
// only "name" is required
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
<p>This document is intended to provide a clear specification of the RDF
vocabulary description language to those who find the formal semantics
-specification [RDF11-MT]
+specification [[RDF11-MT]]
daunting. Thus, this document duplicates material also specified in the RDF
Semantics specification . Where there is disagreement between this document
and the RDF Semantics specification, the RDF Semantics specification should
@@ -178,14 +178,14 @@
This can be done without the need to re-define the original description of
these classes. One benefit of the RDF property-centric approach is that it
allows anyone to extend the description of existing resources, one of the
-architectural principles of the Web [BERNERS-LEE98].</p>
+architectural principles of the Web [[BERNERS-LEE98]].</p>
<p>This specification does not attempt to enumerate all the possible forms of
vocabulary description that are useful for representing the meaning of RDF
classes and properties. Instead, the RDF vocabulary description strategy is
to acknowledge that there are many techniques through which the meaning of
classes and properties can be described. Richer vocabulary or 'ontology'
-languages such as OWL [OWL2-OVERVIEW], inference rule
+languages such as OWL [[OWL2-OVERVIEW]], inference rule
languages and other formalisms (for example temporal logics) will each
contribute to our ability to capture meaningful generalizations about data in
the Web. RDF vocabulary designers can create and deploy Semantic Web
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@
super-class of a class C, then all instances of C are also instances of C'.
</p>
-<p>The RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax [RDF11-CONCEPTS] specification
+<p>The RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax [[RDF11-CONCEPTS]] specification
defines the RDF concept of an <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-Datatypes">RDF
datatype</a>. All datatypes are classes. The instances of a class that is a
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
<code>rdfs:Datatype</code> correspond to the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-Datatypes">RDF
model of a datatype</a> described in the RDF Concepts specification
-[RDF11-CONCEPTS].
+[[RDF11-CONCEPTS]].
<code>rdfs:Datatype</code> is
both an instance of and a <a href="#def-subclass">subclass</a> of <a
href="#ch_class"><code>rdfs:Class</code></a>. Each instance of <code>rdfs:Datatype</code> is a <a href="#def-subclass">subclass</a> of rdfs:Literal.</p>
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@
<section id="ch_properties">
<h2>Properties</a></h2>
-<p>The RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax specification [RDF-CONCEPTS]
+<p>The RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax specification [[RDF-CONCEPTS]]
describes the concept of an RDF property as a relation between subject
resources and object resources.</p>
@@ -342,16 +342,16 @@
property that is the super-property of all properties.
</p>
-<p>
-<strong>Note</strong>: The basic facilities provided by
+<div class="note">
+The basic facilities provided by
<a href="#ch_domain"><code>rdfs:domain</code></a> and
<a href="#ch_range"><code>rdfs:range</code></a> do not provide any direct
way to indicate property restrictions that are local to a class. Although
it is possible to combine use <a
href="#ch_domain"><code>rdfs:domain</code></a> and <a href="#ch_range"><code>rdfs:range</code></a>
with sub-property hierarchies, direct support for such declarations are
-provided by richer Web Ontology</a> languages such as OWL [OWL2-OVERVIEW].
-</p>
+provided by richer Web Ontology</a> languages such as OWL [[OWL2-OVERVIEW]].
+</div>
<section id="ch_range">
<h3>rdfs:range</h3>
@@ -573,12 +573,12 @@
<p>RDF containers are resources that are used to represent collections. An introduction
to RDF containers with examples may be found in the RDF 2004 Primer
-[RDF-PRIMER]. The same resource may appear in a container more than
+[[RDF-PRIMER]]. The same resource may appear in a container more than
once. Unlike containment in the physical world, a container may be
contained in itself.</p>
<p>Three different kinds of container are defined. Whilst the formal
-semantics [RDF11-MT] of all three classes of container are identical,
+semantics [[RDF11-MT]] of all three classes of container are identical,
different classes may be used to indicate informally further
information. An rdf:Bag is used to indicate that the container is
intended to be unordered. An rdf:Seq is used to indicate that the
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@
<section id="ch_reificationvocab">
<h3>Reification Vocabulary</h3>
-<p>@@ Check. The 1999 RDF Model and Syntax Specification [RDFMS] defined a
+<p>@@ Check. The 1999 RDF Model and Syntax Specification [[RDFMS]] defined a
vocabulary for describing RDF statements without stating them.
The 2004 RDF specification did not assign a normative
formal semantics to this vocabulary. However, an intended meaning of