--- a/ontology/ProvenanceFormalModel.html Sat Oct 15 20:13:41 2011 -0400
+++ b/ontology/ProvenanceFormalModel.html Sat Oct 15 20:32:10 2011 -0400
@@ -235,7 +235,6 @@
</pre>
</div>
- <div class='issue'>Definition of Entity in PROV-DM is confusing, maybe over-complex <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/85">ISSUE-85</a>.</div>
</section> <!-- Classes -->
<section id = "processexecution">
@@ -318,8 +317,7 @@
<p>Revision is defined as a modified version of a Entity.</p>
<div><b>OWL syntax</b></div>
<pre>prov:Revision rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing.</pre>
- <div class='issue'>Revision should be a class not a property. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/48">ISSUE-48</a>.</div>
- </section>
+ </section>
@@ -332,7 +330,6 @@
<p>Examples of instance of class ProvenanceContainer includes a file describing the manufacturing details of a car, such as its batch number, manufacturer, date of manufacture, place of manufacture etc. </p>
<div class='note'> According to the definitions of ProvenanceContainer and Account, both contain a set of provenance assertions and have an identifier. Hence, ProvenanceContainer class can also be used to create instances of accounts.
</div>
- <div class='issue'>Asserter needs to be defined. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/51">ISSUE-51</a>.</div>
<div class='issue'>Scope and Identifiers. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/81">ISSUE-81</a>.</div>
</section>
@@ -449,7 +446,6 @@
<p><i>Note: No arity constraints are assumed between Entity and ProcessExecution</i></p>
<img src="diagram-history/khalidDiagrams/used.png"
style="height: 3em" alt="used links ProcessExecution to Entity" />
- <div class='issue'>Should we define a taxonomy of use? This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/23">ISSUE-23</a>.</div>
<div><b>Example</b></div>
<p> Example of Used property from the <a href="http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#a-file-scenario"> provenance scenario </a> is <i>pe2 Used e2</i>. The RDF/XML syntax for asserting this is given below.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
@@ -497,11 +493,7 @@
</prov:wasControlledBy>
</rdf:Description>
</pre>
- </div>
- <div class='issue'>Mutual ivpOf each other should be agreed. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/29">ISSUE-29</a></div>
- <div class='issue'>Do we need a sameAsEntity relation. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/35">ISSUE-35</a></div>
- <div class='issue'>Is ivpOf transitive? This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/45">ISSUE-45</a></div>
- <div class='issue'> Comments on ivpof in <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/57">ISSUE-57</a>.</div>
+ </div>
</section>