--- a/ldp.html Mon Feb 24 09:13:53 2014 -0500
+++ b/ldp.html Thu Feb 27 16:00:38 2014 -0500
@@ -1,15 +1,13 @@
-
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!--
TODO: Search for them within this document.
TODO: Once companion documents (best practices, primer) have URLs, link to them. Search on "companion".
- TODO: Once the membership* names stabilize, take a pass through for "membership consistent value", membership-constant-URI
- and see if there is a friendlier way to phrase it.
TODO: Consider how to not have to explicitly list parent classes.
TODO: Improve LDPC intro by explaining simply that LDP-DC restricts LDPC and LDP-BC restricts LDP-DC.
TODO: Add new "discovery of server capabilities" non-norm section
TODO: Missing namespace definition clause?
TODO: 6.2.2 -- consider 6.2.2.1 rules LDP-DC MUST BE a LDPC, ... to deal with inferencing
+ TODO: Consider folding LDP Clients section, feels a bit out of place
-->
<html>
<head>
@@ -1396,7 +1394,7 @@
201-Created and URI indicated by <code>Location</code> response header), <a title="LDP server">LDP servers</a> MAY create an associated
<a title="Linked Data Platform RDF Source">LDP-RS</a>
to contain data about the newly created LDP-NR. If an LDPC server creates this associated <a title="Linked Data Platform RDF Source">LDP-RS</a> it MUST indicate
- its location on the HTTP response using the HTTP <code>Link</code> response header with link relation <code>describedBy</code>
+ its location on the HTTP response using the HTTP <code>Link</code> response header with link relation <code>describedby</code>
and <code>href</code> to be the URI of the associated LDP-RS resource [[!RFC5988]].
</h2></section><!-- Was 5.4.12 / #ldpc-5_4_12 -->
@@ -1536,7 +1534,7 @@
to contain data about the non-LDPR (see <a href="#ldpc-post-createbinlinkmetahdr">LDPC POST section</a>).
For LDP-NRs that have this associated LDP-RS, an LDPC server MUST provide an HTTP <code>Link</code>
header whose target URI is the associated LDP-RS, and whose link relation type is
- <code>describedBy</code> [[!RFC5988]].
+ <code>describedby</code> [[!RFC5988]].
</h2></section><!-- Was 5.9.2 / #ldpc-5_9_2 -->
</section> <!-- h2 -->
@@ -1772,7 +1770,6 @@
fragment component [[!RFC3986]].
</p>
</blockquote>
- </h2>
</section>
<section id="prefer-omit"><h2 class="normal">
@@ -1787,7 +1784,6 @@
Where <code>WSP</code> and <code>ldp-uri-list</code> are defined as above for <a href="#prefer-include">include</a>.
</p>
</blockquote>
- </h2>
</section>
<section id="prefer-conflicts"><h2 class="normal">
@@ -2082,7 +2078,7 @@
<!-- <blockquote><em><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130930/">Candidate Recommendation Draft</a></em></blockquote> wah -->
<!-- <blockquote><em><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130730/">Last Call Draft</a></em></blockquote> -->
<ul>
- <li>2014-02-24 - Corrected rel=meta to be rel=describedBy (SS) </li>
+ <li>2014-02-24 - Corrected rel=meta to be rel=describedby (SS) </li>
<li>2014-02-24 - Adjusted term membership triples and membership predicate (SS) </li>
<li>2014-02-24 - Removed 6.3.1 LDPC GET requirement and put in general clause (SS) </li>
<li>2014-02-20 - Changed LDPC SHOULD NOT put (6.5.1) to be about containment (SS) </li>