LDP-BCs use contains not member for membership triples
authorJohn Arwe
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:25:51 -0500
changeset 469 6970791bad8e
parent 468 f960af656afb
child 470 eb040e50a66f
LDP-BCs use contains not member for membership triples
--- a/ldp.html	Fri Feb 07 12:01:23 2014 -0500
+++ b/ldp.html	Fri Feb 07 13:25:51 2014 -0500
@@ -1494,12 +1494,6 @@
 	</section><!-- Was 5.1.2 / #ldpc-ordering -->
-<div class="ldp-issue-pending">
-This section is current "under construction" while editors are trying to thoroughly complete edits for 
-<a href="https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/120">ACTION-120</a>.
 <section id="ldpc-general">
 	<p>The Linked Data Platform does not define how clients
@@ -1526,9 +1520,12 @@
 		<code>rdf:Seq</code> or <code>rdf:List</code>.
 	</h2></section><!-- Was 5.2.8 / #ldpc-5_2_8 -->
-	<section id="ldpc-mbrpred"><h2 class="normal"><a title="LDP server">LDP servers</a>
+	<section id="ldpc-mbrpred"><h2 class="normal">
+		<a title="Linked Data Platform Direct Container">LDP Direct Containers</a>
+		and <a title="Linked Data Platform Indirect Container">LDP Indirect Containers</a>
 		SHOULD use the <code>ldp:member</code> predicate as an LDPC's <a title="Membership predicate">membership predicate</a>
-		if there is no obvious predicate from an application vocabulary to use.
+		if there is no obvious predicate from an application vocabulary to use 
+		(<a title="Linked Data Platform Basic Container">LDP-BCs</a> <a href="#ldpc-containtriple-basic">always use <code>ldp:contains</code></a>).
 		The state of an LDPC includes information about which
 		resources are its members, in the form of <a title="Membership triples">membership triples</a> that
 		follow a consistent pattern.  The LDPC's state contains enough information for clients to discern
@@ -1583,7 +1580,7 @@
 			behave as if their state contains the triple 
 			whose subject is the LDPC URI, 
 			whose predicate is <code>ldp:containsRelation</code>, 
-			and whose object is <code>ldp:member</code>,
+			and whose object is <code>ldp:contains</code>,
 			but there is no requirement to materialize this triple in LDP-BC representations.
 	</section><!-- Was / #ldpc-5_2_5_1 -->
@@ -2309,6 +2306,7 @@
 <!-- <blockquote><em><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130930/">Candidate Recommendation Draft</a></em></blockquote> wah -->
 <!-- <blockquote><em><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130730/">Last Call Draft</a></em></blockquote> -->
+	<li>2014-02-07 - LDP-BCs use ldp:contains not ldp:member (JA)</li>
 	<li>2014-02-07 - Simplified some of the container examples (SS)</li>
 	<li>2014-02-06 - partial first pass at arnaud's email comments (JA)</li>
 	<li>2014-02-06 - fixing containment def, adding containment triples to terminology (JA)</li>