Added a not pointing out that groups can have additional processes. ISSUE-83
--- a/tr.html Mon Feb 03 03:02:02 2014 +0400
+++ b/tr.html Tue Feb 04 21:18:23 2014 +0400
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
<p>This is an intermediate revised draft proposal to replace the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html">current
chapter 7 of the W3C process document</a> with a more effective W3C
Specification life cycle following the meeting of the W3C Advisory
- Board's Chapter 7 Task Force on 28 January 2014. This document is an
+ Board's Chapter 7 Task Force on 3 February 2014. This document is an
editor's draft for resolution of comments received.</p>
<p>In this draft, there are some pointers and placeholders for changes
expected in response to open issues, most particularly <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/77">ISSUE-77</a>.</p>
@@ -229,6 +229,9 @@
Published. There are few formal requirements to publish a document as a
W3C Note, and they have no standing as a recommendation of W3C but are
simply documents preserved for historical reference.</p>
+ <p>Individual Working Groups and Interest Groups may adopt additional
+ processes for developing publications, so long as they do not conflict
+ with the requirements in this chapter.</p>
<h4 id="recs-and-notes">7.1.1 Recommendations and Notes</h4>
<p>W3C follows these steps when advancing a technical report to
Recommendation.</p>