--- a/tr.html Sun Feb 02 02:56:00 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html Mon Feb 03 03:02:02 2014 +0400
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
height="48" width="72"></a> </p>
<h1 class="title" id="title">Recommendation Track Process draft proposal</h1>
<h2 id="draft-shorthand-status"><abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium"></abbr>Editors'
- Draft 22 January 2014</h2>
+ Draft 2 February 2014</h2>
<dl>
<dt>Current active version:</dt>
<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html">http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html</a></dd>
@@ -52,11 +52,10 @@
<p>This is an intermediate revised draft proposal to replace the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html">current
chapter 7 of the W3C process document</a> with a more effective W3C
Specification life cycle following the meeting of the W3C Advisory
- Board's Chapter 7 Task Force on 14 January 2014. This document is an
+ Board's Chapter 7 Task Force on 28 January 2014. This document is an
editor's draft for resolution of comments received.</p>
<p>In this draft, there are some pointers and placeholders for changes
- expected in response to open issues, most particularly <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/59">ISSUE-59</a>
- and <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/77">ISSUE-77</a>.</p>
+ expected in response to open issues, most particularly <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/77">ISSUE-77</a>.</p>
<p>This introductory session (before the chapter title below) will be
removed when this chapter is re-incorporated into the full process
document, as per issues 60-64.</p>
@@ -633,7 +632,7 @@
<li><a href="#Note">Working Group Note</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="issue">Add an explanation of publishing a revised Candidate
- Recommendation. <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/59">ISSUE-59</a></p>
+ Recommendation. <a href="http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/77">ISSUE-77</a></p>
<p>If there are any <a href="#substantive-change">substantive changes</a>
made to a Candidate Recommendation other than to remove features
explicitly identified as "at risk", the Working Group <em class="rfc2119">must</em>