Editorial changes as per http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] (review by Steve Zilles)
authorcharles
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:56:11 +0100
changeset 89 7b7b4c9d13fd
parent 88 7888c7740cae
child 90 13a947c0bdc9
Editorial changes as per http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] (review by Steve Zilles)
tr.html
--- a/tr.html	Mon Mar 10 00:15:20 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Mon Mar 10 00:56:11 2014 +0100
@@ -631,7 +631,9 @@
         next step)</li>
       <li><a href="#Note">Working Group Note</a></li>
     </ul>
-    <p> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+    <p>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
+        rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>&nbsp;to
+      the Working Group decision to request advancement <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
         Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
       the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
     <h4 id="revised-cr">7.4.1 Revising a Candidate Recommendation</h4>
@@ -687,20 +689,21 @@
           href="#wide-review">wide review,</a></li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that all issues raised during the
         Candidate Recommendation review period other than by Advisory Committee
-        representatives acting in<br>
-        &nbsp;&nbsp; their formal AC representative role have been <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+        representatives acting in their formal AC representative role have been
+        <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
           addressed</a>,</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must </em>identify any substantive issues raised
         since the close of the Candidate Recommendation review period by parties
-        other than Advisory Committee representatives,</li>
-      <li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> remove features identified in the
-        Candidate Recommendation document as "at risk" without repeating the
-        transition to Candidate Recommendation.</li>
+        other than Advisory Committee representatives acting in their formal AC
+        representative role,</li>
+      <li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> have removed features identified in the
+        Candidate Recommendation document as "at risk" without republishing the
+        specification as a Candidate Recommendation.</li>
     </ul>
     <p>The Director:</p>
     <ul>
-      <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the Request for publication of
-        a Proposed Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+      <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication of a Proposed
+        Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
           Committee</a>, and</li>
       <li><span><em class="rfc2119">may</em> approve a Proposed Recommendation
           with minimal implementation experience where there is a compelling
@@ -797,10 +800,10 @@
         Recommendations</a>, a Working Group</p>
     <ul>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> republish the document, identifying it
-        as the basis of a Request for Recommendation,</li>
+        as a Proposed (edited) Recommendation,</li>
       <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the document has received <a
           href="#wide-review">wide review</a>, and </li>
-      <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> address all errata.</li>
+      <li><em class="rfc2119">should</em> address all recorded errata.</li>
     </ul>
     <p>For changes which introduces a new feature or features, W3C <span class="rfc2119">must</span>
       follow the full process of <a href="#rec-advance">advancing a technical
@@ -812,7 +815,7 @@
       requirements, non-normative guides to good practices, as well as
       specifications where work has been stopped and there is no longer interest
       in making them a new standard.</p>
-    <p>In order to publish a Note a Working Group or Interest Group: </p>
+    <p>In order to publish a Note, a Working Group or Interest Group: </p>
     <ul>
       <li> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> publish a Note with or without its
         prior publication as a Working Draft.</li>