--- a/cover.html	Sat Sep 13 20:22:14 2014 +0200
+++ b/cover.html	Sat Sep 13 20:35:33 2014 +0200
@@ -1407,14 +1407,6 @@
           Statement for each Activity that has not been closed. <span class="issue">Should
             we put this requirement on charters?</span></p>
         <h3>5.2 Advisory Committee Review of an Activity Proposal</h3>
-        <p>The Director <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span> solicit <a href="#ReviewAppeal">Advisory
-            Committee review</a> of every proposal to create, substantively
-          modify, or <strong>extend</strong> an Activity. <span class="issue"><strong></strong>currently
-            charters can be extended without review - should that be changed?
-            Resolved NO</span> The review period <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span>
-          be at least <span class="time-interval">four weeks</span>. <span class="issue">Keep
-            four week requirement for charter review? Resolved YES?<br>
-          </span></p>
         <br>
         <br>
         <h3>5.6 Activity Proposals</h3>
@@ -1808,7 +1800,8 @@
             Committee review</a> of every new or substantively modified Working
           Group or Interest Group charter. The Director is <span class="rfc2119">NOT
             REQUIRED</span> to solicit Advisory Committee review prior to a
-          charter extension or for minor changes.</p>
+          charter extension or for minor changes. The review period <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
+          be at least four weeks.</p>
         <p>The Director's Call for Review of a substantively modified charter <span
             class="rfc2119">MUST</span> highlight important changes (e.g.,
           regarding deliverables or resource allocation) and include rationale
@@ -1831,9 +1824,7 @@
           re-designated).</p>
         <p>Advisory Committee representatives <span class="rfc2119">MAY</span>
           <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a> creation or substantive modification of
-          a Working Group or Interest Group charter. <span class="issue">For
-            Activities the appeal required dissent in the review. Should we have
-            that constraint?</span></p>
+          a Working Group or Interest Group charter.&nbsp;</p>
         <h4>6.2.5 <a id="charter-extension">Working Group and Interest Group
             Charter Extension</a></h4>
         <p>To extend a Working Group or Interest Group charter with no other
@@ -1850,8 +1841,7 @@
             Experts</a>.</p>
         <p>Advisory Committee representatives <span class="rfc2119">MAY</span>
           <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a> the extension of a Working Group or
-          Interest Group charter. <span class="issue">For Activities the appeal
-            required dissent in the review. Should we have that constraint?</span></p>
+          Interest Group charter.&nbsp;</p>
         <h4>6.2.6 <a id="WGCharter">Working Group and Interest Group Charters</a></h4>
         <p>A Working Group or Interest Group charter <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span>
           include all of the following information.</p>
@@ -2880,8 +2870,6 @@
       <h3>8.1 <a id="ACReview">Advisory Committee Reviews</a></h3>
       <p>The Advisory Committee reviews:</p>
       <ul>
-        <li>proposals for <a href="#ActivityCreation">new</a>, <a href="#ActivityModification">modified</a>,
-          and <a href="#ActivityExtension">extended Activities</a>,</li>
         <li><a href="#CharterReview">new and modified Working and Interest
             Groups</a>,</li>
         <li><a href="#cfr">Proposed Recommendations</a>, <a href="#cfr-edited">Proposed
@@ -2952,15 +2940,13 @@
         <li><a href="#rec-publication">Publication of a Recommendation</a> or <a
             href="#proposed-rescinded-rec">Publication of a Rescinded
             Recommendation</a>,</li>
-        <li><a href="#ActivityProposal">Activity creation</a>, <a href="#ActivityModification">modification</a>,
-          or <a href="#ActivityExtension">extension</a>,</li>
-        <li><a href="#cfp">Working or Interest Group creation</a> or <a href="#charter-extension">extension</a>,</li>
+        <li><a href="#cfp">Working or Interest Group creation</a>, substantive <a
+            href="#CharterReview">modification</a> or <a href="#charter-extension">extension</a>,</li>
         <li>Changes to the <a href="#GAProcess">W3C process</a>.</li>
       </ul>
       <p>Advisory Committee representatives <span class="rfc2119">MAY</span>
         always appeal the following decisions:</p>
       <ul>
-        <li><a href="#ActivityTermination">Activity closure</a>,</li>
         <li><a href="#charter-extension">Working or Interest Group extension</a>
           or <a href="#GeneralTermination">closure</a>,</li>
         <li><a href="#candidate-rec">Call for Implementations</a>, <a href="#cfr">Call