Removing unnecessary things left from ACtivities, per resolutions for issues 112, 113, 116, 117
authorcharles
Sat, 13 Sep 2014 20:22:14 +0200
changeset 116 3af8ec1dddbf
parent 115 6c67714f964e
child 117 b8973f0295c3
Removing unnecessary things left from ACtivities, per resolutions for issues 112, 113, 116, 117
cover.html
--- a/cover.html	Sat Sep 13 20:08:32 2014 +0200
+++ b/cover.html	Sat Sep 13 20:22:14 2014 +0200
@@ -1401,14 +1401,6 @@
             have been left here, until there is a resolution on what to do about
             them.</em></p>
         <br>
-        <p>Based on input from the Team and Members about the structure and
-          scope of an Activity, the Team sends an <a href="#ActivityProposal">Activity
-            Proposal</a> to the Advisory Committee. This is a proposal to
-          dedicate Team and Member resources to a particular area of Web
-          technology or policy, and when there is consensus about the
-          motivation, scope, and structure of the proposed work, W3C starts a
-          new Activity. <span class="issue">Move this to cover charter
-            development</span></p>
         <p>The progress of each Activity is documented in an Activity Statement.
           At least before each <a href="#ACMeetings">Advisory Committee meeting</a>,
           the Team <span class="rfc2119">SHOULD</span> revise the Activity
@@ -1418,20 +1410,13 @@
         <p>The Director <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span> solicit <a href="#ReviewAppeal">Advisory
             Committee review</a> of every proposal to create, substantively
           modify, or <strong>extend</strong> an Activity. <span class="issue"><strong></strong>currently
-            charters can be extended without review - should that be changed?</span>
-          The review period <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span> be at least <span
-            class="time-interval">four weeks</span>. <span class="issue">Keep
-            four week requirement for charter review (probably yes)?<br>
+            charters can be extended without review - should that be changed?
+            Resolved NO</span> The review period <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span>
+          be at least <span class="time-interval">four weeks</span>. <span class="issue">Keep
+            four week requirement for charter review? Resolved YES?<br>
           </span></p>
-        <p>The Director announces to the Advisory Committee whether there is
-          consensus within W3C to create or modify the Activity (possibly with
-          changes suggested during the review). For a new Activity, this
-          announcement officially creates the Activity.&nbsp; <span class="issue">Move
-            this to cover charter development</span></p>
-        <p>If there was <a href="#def-Dissent">dissent</a>, Advisory Committee
-          representatives <span class="rfc2119">MAY</span> <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
-          a decision to create, modify, or extend the Activity. <span class="issue">This
-            is different from the equivalent for charters</span></p>
+        <br>
+        <br>
         <h3>5.6 Activity Proposals</h3>
         <p>An Activity Proposal defines the initial scope and structure of an
           Activity. The proposal <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span> include or