--- a/cover.html Thu Aug 14 13:30:38 2014 +0200
+++ b/cover.html Thu Aug 14 13:50:46 2014 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="content-type">
<meta name="keywords" content="W3C, World Wide Web, Web, WWW, Consortium, process, Team, Recommendation, Advisory Committee, Advisory Board, Working Group, Coordination Group, Interest Group, W3C Activity, Workshop, Symposium, charter, Activity Proposal, Working Draft, Process Document, Candidate Recommendation, Director, Proposed Recommendation, Last Call, Submission request">
- <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/base.css">
+ <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/base.css">
<title>World Wide Web Consortium Process Document</title>
<style type="text/css">
.about { margin-left: 3em; margin-right: 3em; font-size: .83em}
@@ -11,11 +11,12 @@
.diagram { text-align: center; margin: 2.5em 0 }
.issue:before {content: "Issue: "}
.issue {border: 2px dashed red; background-color: #ffa;}
+ .issue .issue {background-color: #fcc;}
.rfc2119 {font-variant:small-caps}
</style> <!--[if lt IE 9]><script src='undefined://www.w3.org/2008/site/js/html5shiv.js'></script><![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
- <div class="head"><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img alt="W3C" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home"
+ <div class="head"><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img alt="W3C" src="https://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home"
height="48" width="72"></a>
<h1>W3C Draft Process Document</h1>
<h2 class="notoc">14 August 2014 Editor's Draft</h2>
@@ -1421,8 +1422,8 @@
modify, or <strong>extend</strong> an Activity. <span class="issue"><strong></strong>currently
charters can be extended without review - should that be changed?</span>
The review period <span class="rfc2119">MUST</span> be at least <span
- class="time-interval">four weeks</span>. <span class="issue">Keep four
- week requirement for charter review (probably yes)?<br>
+ class="time-interval">four weeks</span>. <span class="issue">Keep
+ four week requirement for charter review (probably yes)?<br>
</span></p>
<p>The Director announces to the Advisory Committee whether there is
consensus within W3C to create or modify the Activity (possibly with
@@ -1846,9 +1847,9 @@
re-designated).</p>
<p>Advisory Committee representatives <span class="rfc2119">MAY</span>
<a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a> creation or substantive modification of
- a Working Group or Interest Group charter. <span class="issue">For Activities
- the appeal required dissent in the review. Should we have that
- constraint?</span></p>
+ a Working Group or Interest Group charter. <span class="issue">For
+ Activities the appeal required dissent in the review. Should we have
+ that constraint?</span></p>
<h4>6.2.5 <a id="charter-extension">Working Group and Interest Group
Charter Extension</a></h4>
<p>To extend a Working Group or Interest Group charter with no other