--- a/tr.html	Mon Mar 10 01:00:21 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Wed Mar 19 12:43:42 2014 +0100
@@ -678,11 +678,11 @@
     <p>In addition to meeting the <a href="#transition-reqs">general
         requirements for advancement</a>,</p>
     <ul>
-      <li>The status information <span class="rfc2119">must</span> specify the
+      <li>The status information <em class="rfc2119">must</em> specify the
         deadline for Advisory Committee review, which <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
         be <strong>at least</strong> 28 days after the publication of the
-        Proposed Recommendation and <span class="rfc2119">should</span> be at
-        least 10 days after the end of the last Exclusion Opportunity per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
+        Proposed Recommendation and <em class="rfc2119">should</em> be at least
+        10 days after the end of the last Exclusion Opportunity per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
           4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
           Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</li>
     </ul>
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@
     <ul>
       <li>A Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must</em> identify where errata
         are tracked, and</li>
-      <li>A Recommendation <span class="rfc2119">must not</span> include any
+      <li>A Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must not</em> include any
         substantive changes from the Proposed Recommendation on which it is
         based.</li>
       <li>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
@@ -774,20 +774,18 @@
       class of mistake, from mere editorial to a serious error that may affect
       the conformance with the Recommendation by software or content (e.g.,
       content validity).</p>
-    <p>Working Groups <span class="rfc2119">must</span> track errata on an
-      "errata page." An errata page is a list of enumerated errors, possibly
-      accompanied by corrections. Each Recommendation links to an errata page;
-      see the Team's <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules">Publication
-        Rules</a>.</p>
+    <p>Working Groups <em class="rfc2119">must</em> track errata on an "errata
+      page." An errata page is a list of enumerated errors, possibly accompanied
+      by corrections. Each Recommendation links to an errata page; see the
+      Team's <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules">Publication Rules</a>.</p>
     <p>A correction is first "proposed" by the Working Group. A correction
       becomes part of the Recommendation by the process for Revising a
       Recommendation described in the next section.</p>
-    <p>A Working Group <span class="rfc2119">should</span> keep their errata
-      pages up-to-date, as errors are reported by readers and implementers. A
-      Working Group <span class="rfc2119">must</span> report errata page
-      changes to interested parties, notably when corrections are proposed or
-      incorporated into an Edited Recommendation, according to the Team's
-      requirements.</p>
+    <p>A Working Group <em class="rfc2119">should</em> keep their errata pages
+      up-to-date, as errors are reported by readers and implementers. A Working
+      Group <em class="rfc2119">must</em> report errata page changes to
+      interested parties, notably when corrections are proposed or incorporated
+      into an Edited Recommendation, according to the Team's requirements.</p>
     <h4 id="revised-rec">7.7.2 Revising a Recommendation</h4>
     <p>Editorial changes to a Recommendation require no technical review of the
       proposed changes. A Working Group <span class="rfc2119">may</span>
@@ -898,6 +896,9 @@
       Rescinded Recommendation. In this case the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
         Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
       the decision.</p>
+    <p> A Rescinded Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be published
+      with up to date status. The updated version <em class="rfc2119">may</em>
+      remove the rescinded content (i.e. the main body of the document).</p>
     <h3 id="good-practice">Further reading</h3>
     <p>Refer to <a href="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/Transitions">"How to
         Organize a Recommendation Track Transition"</a> in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/">Member