update extensibility section. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15307
authorAnne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:54:16 +0100
changeset 29 ac2bf114fd20
parent 28 20b49c8da6d3
child 30 9090a37c787f
update extensibility section. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15307
Overview.html
Overview.src.html
--- a/Overview.html	Thu Dec 22 10:19:47 2011 +0100
+++ b/Overview.html	Thu Dec 22 10:54:16 2011 +0100
@@ -310,14 +310,13 @@
   <h3 id="extensibility"><span class="secno">2.2 </span>Extensibility</h3>
 
   <p>User agents, Working Groups, and other interested parties are
-  <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss extensions on a relevant public
+  <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss new features on a relevant public
   forum, preferably
   <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>. If this
-  is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start
-  the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a
-  private method <code>bar()</code> it could be named <code>FooBar()</code>
-  to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized
-  <code>bar()</code>.</p>
+  is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way. E.g. if
+  company Foo wants to add a proprietary method <code>bar()</code> it could
+  be named <code>fooBar()</code> to prevent clashes with a potential
+  non-proprietary method <code>bar()</code>.</p>
 
 
 
--- a/Overview.src.html	Thu Dec 22 10:19:47 2011 +0100
+++ b/Overview.src.html	Thu Dec 22 10:54:16 2011 +0100
@@ -318,14 +318,13 @@
   <h3 id="extensibility">Extensibility</h3>
 
   <p>User agents, Working Groups, and other interested parties are
-  <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss extensions on a relevant public
+  <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss new features on a relevant public
   forum, preferably
   <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>. If this
-  is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start
-  the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a
-  private method <code>bar()</code> it could be named <code>FooBar()</code>
-  to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized
-  <code>bar()</code>.</p>
+  is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way. E.g. if
+  company Foo wants to add a proprietary method <code>bar()</code> it could
+  be named <code>fooBar()</code> to prevent clashes with a potential
+  non-proprietary method <code>bar()</code>.</p>