update extensibility section. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15307
--- a/Overview.html Thu Dec 22 10:19:47 2011 +0100
+++ b/Overview.html Thu Dec 22 10:54:16 2011 +0100
@@ -310,14 +310,13 @@
<h3 id="extensibility"><span class="secno">2.2 </span>Extensibility</h3>
<p>User agents, Working Groups, and other interested parties are
- <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss extensions on a relevant public
+ <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss new features on a relevant public
forum, preferably
<a href="mailto:public-webapps@w3.org">public-webapps@w3.org</a>. If this
- is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start
- the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a
- private method <code>bar()</code> it could be named <code>FooBar()</code>
- to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized
- <code>bar()</code>.</p>
+ is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way. E.g. if
+ company Foo wants to add a proprietary method <code>bar()</code> it could
+ be named <code>fooBar()</code> to prevent clashes with a potential
+ non-proprietary method <code>bar()</code>.</p>
--- a/Overview.src.html Thu Dec 22 10:19:47 2011 +0100
+++ b/Overview.src.html Thu Dec 22 10:54:16 2011 +0100
@@ -318,14 +318,13 @@
<h3 id="extensibility">Extensibility</h3>
<p>User agents, Working Groups, and other interested parties are
- <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss extensions on a relevant public
+ <em>strongly encouraged</em> to discuss new features on a relevant public
forum, preferably
<a href="mailto:public-webapps@w3.org">public-webapps@w3.org</a>. If this
- is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start
- the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a
- private method <code>bar()</code> it could be named <code>FooBar()</code>
- to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized
- <code>bar()</code>.</p>
+ is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way. E.g. if
+ company Foo wants to add a proprietary method <code>bar()</code> it could
+ be named <code>fooBar()</code> to prevent clashes with a potential
+ non-proprietary method <code>bar()</code>.</p>