Deleted Structure of this Document section. Removed a spurious char in the Acknowledgements.
--- a/index.html Wed May 25 18:28:58 2011 +0100
+++ b/index.html Wed May 25 19:05:48 2011 +0100
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
<li>formal semantics [[!RDF-MT]], and</li>
- <li>this document, (sections 4, 5 and 6).</li>
+ <li>this document, (sections 4, 5, 6 and 7).</li>
</ul>
<p>Within this document, normative sections are explicitly labelled as such.
@@ -169,30 +169,6 @@
Others (cf. OWL [[OWL-REF]] and
the applications mentioned in the primer
[[RDF-PRIMER]]) are in development.</p>
-
-
-<section id="section-Structure">
- <h3>Structure of this Document</h3>
-
- <p>In <a href="#section-Overview">section 2</a>,
-the background rationale and design goals
-are introduced.
-Key concepts follow in <a href="#section-Concepts">section 3</a>.
-<a href="#section-URIspaces">Section 4</a> discusses URI references
-reserved for use by RDF.
-</p>
-
-
- <p><a href="#section-Datatypes">Section 5</a> discusses datatypes.
-XML content of
- literals is described in <a href="#section-XMLLiteral">section
- 5.1</a>, and the abstract syntax is defined in <a href=
- "#section-Graph-syntax">section 6</a> of this document.</p>
-
- <p><a href="#section-fragID">Section 7</a> discusses the role of fragment
- identifiers in URI references used with RDF.</p>
-</section>
-
</section>
@@ -1459,7 +1435,7 @@
<!--<li>-->Paul Resnick (University of Michigan), <!--</li>-->
<!--<li>-->Bill Roberts (KnowledgeCite), <!--</li>-->
-i
+
<!--<li>-->Tsuyoshi Sakata (Digital Vision Laboratories), <!--</li>-->
<!--<li>-->Bob Schloss (IBM), <!--</li>-->
@@ -1489,6 +1465,7 @@
<h2>Changes since First Edition</h2>
<ul>
+ <li>2011-05-25: Deleted “Structure of this Document” section, it added no value beyond the TOC</li>
<li>2011-05-25: Implemented resolution of <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/40">ISSUE-40: Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument</a> by adding a section on <a href="#section-skolemization">Replacing Blank Nodes with IRIs</a></li>
<li>2011-05-25: rdf:XMLLiteral is disjoint from any datatype not explicitly related to it, per erratum <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/errata#concept-xmlliteral">[concept-xmlliteral]</a></li>
<li>2011-05-25: Added Conformance section with RFC2119 reference</li>