Update for ISSUE-139 resolution.
authorDavid Wood <dwood@zepheira.com>
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:41:05 -0400
changeset 1076 bc454a868f9d
parent 1075 9e1d21098b57
child 1077 3f841d8ad7a2
Update for ISSUE-139 resolution.
rdf-concepts/index.html
--- a/rdf-concepts/index.html	Sat Sep 07 21:13:17 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-concepts/index.html	Tue Sep 10 20:41:05 2013 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 .figure a[href]:hover { background: transparent; }
 table td, table th { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 0.2em 0.5em; }
     </style>
-    <script src="//www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c-common" class="remove"></script>
+    <script src="http://www.w3.org/Tools/respec/respec-w3c-common" class="remove"></script>
     <script class='remove'>
       var respecConfig = {
           // specification status (e.g. WD, LC, WG-NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
@@ -1302,20 +1302,27 @@
 <section id="section-generalized-rdf" class="informative">
     <h2>Generalized RDF Triples, Graphs, and Datasets</h2>
 
-<p>It is sometimes convenient to loosen the requirements on <a>RDF
-    triple</a>s.  For example, the completeness of the RDFS entailment rules
-    is easier to show with a generalization of RDF triples.  Note that any
-    users of these generalized notions need to be aware that their use may
-    cause interoperability problems, and that there is no requirement on the
-    part of any RDF tool to accept, process, or produce anything beyond
-    regular RDF triples, graphs, and datasets. </p>
+		<p>It is sometimes convenient to loosen the requirements
+    on <a>RDF triple</a>s.  For example, the completeness
+    of the RDFS entailment rules is easier to show with a
+    generalization of RDF triples.   </p>
 
-    <p>A <dfn>generalized RDF triple</dfn> is an RDF triple generalized so
-    that subjects, predicates, and objects are all allowed to be IRIs, blank
-    nodes, or literals.  A <dfn>generalized RDF graph</dfn> is an RDF graph of
-    generalized RDF triples, i.e., a set of generalized RDF triples.
-    A <dfn>generalized RDF dataset</dfn> is an RDF dataset of generalized RDF
-    graphs where graph labels can be IRIs, blank nodes, or literals.</p>
+    <p>A <dfn>generalized RDF triple</dfn> is an RDF triple
+    generalized so that subjects, predicates, and objects
+    are all allowed to be IRIs, blank nodes, or literals.
+    A <dfn>generalized RDF graph</dfn> is an RDF graph of
+    generalized RDF triples, i.e., a set of generalized RDF
+    triples.  A <dfn>generalized RDF dataset</dfn> is an RDF
+    dataset of generalized RDF graphs where graph labels can
+    be IRIs, blank nodes, or literals.</p>
+
+    <p class="note" id="note-generalized-rdf"> Any users of
+    generalized RDF triples, graphs or datasets need to be
+    aware that these notions are non-standard extensions of
+    RDF and their use may cause interoperability problems.
+    There is no requirement on the part of any RDF tool to
+    accept, process, or produce anything beyond standard RDF
+    triples, graphs, and datasets. </p>
 
 </section>
 
@@ -1411,6 +1418,7 @@
   <em>RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax</em>.</p>
 
   <ul>
+		<li>2013-09-10: Update to Section 7 in accordance with <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/139">ISSUE-139</a> (<a href="https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04#resolution_3">resolution</a>)</li>
 		<li>2013-08-26: Update to Section 4.1 to satisfy <a
 		href="https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/283">ACTION-283</a> and <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/140">ISSUE-140</a> (<a
 			href="https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-08-21#resolution_7">resolution</a>)</li>