--- a/rdf-json/index.html	Fri Jun 14 17:49:53 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-json/index.html	Sat Jun 15 00:14:30 2013 +0100
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
           // formal title, define it here
           // subtitle   :  "an excellent document",
 
-          // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
-          // publishDate:  "2009-08-06",
+         // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
+          publishDate:  "2011-08-23",
 
           // if the specification's copyright date is a range of years, specify
           // the start date here:
@@ -103,6 +103,22 @@
 </section>
 
 
+<section id="sotd">
+    <p><b>Important Note:</b> The <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/">RDF Working
+    Group</a> has decided not to push this document through the W3C
+    Recommendation Track. You should therefore not expect to see this
+    document eventually become a W3C Recommendation.</p>
+    <p>Although the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-30#resolution_6">RDF WG decided against it on 30 October 2012</a>, this document MAY be published as a W3C WG Note so that those
+    who are using it and/or have an interest in it have a stable
+    reference.</p>
+    <p>On the other hand, the RDF Working Group decided to put <a
+    href="http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/">JSON-LD</a> on the
+    Recommendation track (see <a hre="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-30#resolution_2">resolution of May 30, 2012</a>). If you have no specific reason to use this
+    document instead of JSON-LD, you are therefore encouraged to use
+    JSON-LD.</p>
+</section>
+
+
 <section id="section-intro">
     <h2>Introduction</h2>