--- a/rdf-primer/index.html	Wed Nov 13 11:06:14 2013 +0000
+++ b/rdf-primer/index.html	Wed Nov 13 11:21:30 2013 +0000
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@
       <div class="example"><a href="http://data.europeana.eu/item/04802/243FA8618938F4117025F17A8B813C5F9AA4D619">http://data.europeana.eu/item/04802/243FA8618938F4117025F17A8B813C5F9AA4D619</a></div>
 
     <p class="note">RDF is agnostic about what the IRI stands for. However,
-    IRIS may be given meaning by particular vocabularies or
+    IRIs may be given meaning by particular vocabularies or
     conventions. VIAF (see example above) is an example of such a vocabulary. RDF
     vocabularies are discussed in more detail in Sec. <a
     href="#section-vocabulary">"RDF vocabularies"</a>. </p>
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@
 
       <h3>Blank nodes</h3>
 
-      <p>IRIS and literals together provide the basic material for
+      <p>IRIs and literals together provide the basic material for
       writing down RDF statements. In addition, it is sometimes handy to
       be able to talk about anonymous resources. For example, we might
       want to state that "the Mona Lisa was created by X" and that "X
@@ -373,6 +373,9 @@
       to denote resources without explicitly naming them with an
       IRI.</p>
 
+      <p class="issue">"survive" might be a bit strong - maybe another
+      wording?</p>
+
       <p class="note">Blank nodes can make RDF look very complicated,
       especially when one consults details about blank nodes in the RDF Concepts
       [[RDF11-CONCEPTS]] and RDF Semantics [[RDF11-MT]] documents. It