--- a/rdf-concepts/index.html Mon Jan 14 10:59:06 2013 +0000
+++ b/rdf-concepts/index.html Mon Jan 14 11:22:11 2013 +0000
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
// subtitle : "an excellent document",
// if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
- publishDate: "2012-06-05",
+// publishDate: "2012-06-05",
// if the specification's copyright date is a range of years, specify
// the start date here:
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
// if there is a previously published draft, uncomment this and set its YYYY-MM-DD date
// and its maturity status
-// previousPublishDate: "2011-08-30",
-// previousMaturity: "WD",
+ previousPublishDate: "2013-01-15",
+ previousMaturity: "WD",
// if there a publicly available Editor's Draft, this is the link
edDraftURI: "https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html",
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
},
{ name: "David Wood", // url: "http://example.org/",
company: "3 Round Stones", companyURL:
- "http://www.3roundstones.com/",
+ "http://3roundstones.com/",
},
],
otherContributors: {
@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@
<li>Let <code>domnodes</code> be the list of
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/#node">DOM nodes</a> [[!DOM4]]
that result from applying the
- <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-end.html#parsing-html-fragments">HTML fragment parsing algorithm</a> [[!HTML5]]
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#parsing-html-fragments">HTML fragment parsing algorithm</a> [[!HTML5]]
to the input string, without a context element.</li>
<li>Let <code>domfrag</code> be a DOM
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/#interface-documentfragment"><code>DocumentFragment</code></a>
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@
<li>2012-11-07: New <a href="#abstract">abstract</a>, based on comments from Dan Connolly</li>
<li>2012-11-06: Tweak definition of <a title="literal">literals</a> to avoid apparent contradiction (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/94">ISSUE-94</a>)</li>
<li>2012-11-06: Add a <a href="#note-custom-datatypes">note</a> on the use of OWL2 custom datatypes and simple user-defined XML Schema datatypes (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/96">ISSUE-96</a>)</li>
- <li>2012-11-06: Add a <a href="#note-empty-named-graphs">note on empty named graphs</a> (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/22">ISSUE-22</a>)</li>
+ <li>2012-11-06: Add a note on empty named graphs (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/22">ISSUE-22</a>)</li>
<li>2012-11-06: Modify the <a title="relative IRI">Note on relative IRIs</a> to stress their usefulness and to clarify the role of RFC 3986 in the resolution process</li>
<li>2012-11-06: Informatively <a href="#referents">explain</a> that IRIs in this spec are treated only as nodes in a graph data model, and no interaction model is implied</li>
<li>2012-08-09: Clarify that all datatypes are optional, but RDF-conformant specifications MAY require specific <a title="datatype map">datatype maps</a></li>