--- a/rdf-schema/Overview.html	Thu Nov 14 13:31:14 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-schema/Overview.html	Thu Nov 14 13:34:00 2013 +0100
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
   </p>
   <h1 class="title p-name" id="title" property="dcterms:title">RDF 1.1 Vocabulary Description Language: RDF Schema</h1>
   
-  <h2 id="w3c-proposed-edited-recommendation-14-november-2013" property="dcterms:issued" datatype="xsd:dateTime" content="2013-11-14T12:09:29.000Z"><abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</abbr> Proposed Edited Recommendation <time class="dt-published" datetime="2013-11-14">14 November 2013</time></h2>
+  <h2 id="w3c-proposed-edited-recommendation-14-november-2013" property="dcterms:issued" datatype="xsd:dateTime" content="2013-11-14T12:31:59.000Z"><abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</abbr> Proposed Edited Recommendation <time class="dt-published" datetime="2013-11-14">14 November 2013</time></h2>
   <dl>
     
       <dt>This version:</dt>
@@ -412,15 +412,15 @@
 of RDF resources that can be used to describe properties of other RDF 
 resources (including properties) in application-specific RDF 
 vocabularies. The core vocabulary is defined in a namespace informally 
-called 'rdfs' here. That namespace is identified by the IRI</p>
+called <code>rdfs</code> here. That namespace is identified by the IRI</p>
 
 <blockquote>
 <code>http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#</code>
 </blockquote>
 
-and is conventiuonally associated with the prefix 
-'rdfs'. This specification also uses the prefix 'rdf' to refer to the
-RDF namespace<p></p>
+and is conventionally associated with the prefix 
+<code>rdfs:</code>. This specification also uses the prefix
+<code>rdf:</code> to refer to the RDF namespace<p></p>
 
 <blockquote>
 <code>http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#</code>
@@ -1349,7 +1349,9 @@
 clarification of that design, and has benefited greatly from the hard work of
 the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/">RDF Core Working Group</a>
 <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#Membership">members</a>, and from
-implementation feedback from many members of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/">RDF Interest Group</a>.</p>
+implementation feedback from many members of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/">RDF Interest Group</a>.The <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/">RDF Working Group</a> edited
+this document in 2013-14 to be in line with the RDF 1.1
+specifications. </p>
 
 <p>David Singer of IBM was the chair of the original RDF Schema group
 throughout most of the development of this specification; we thank David for
@@ -1385,7 +1387,7 @@
 <h3 id="h3_PER-changes" role="heading" aria-level="2"><span class="secno">B.1 </span>Changes for Proposed Edited Recommendation in 2013</h3>
 
 <ul>
-  <li>Conversion to ResPec.</li>
+  <li>Conversion to ResPec, inclduing formatting of examples and notes.</li>
   <li>Refereces and anchors to RDF 1.0 documents where appropriate replaced by
   references and anchors to RDF 1.1 documents.</li>
   <li>Replaced the term "URI Reference" with the term "IRI". </li>
@@ -1398,6 +1400,7 @@
   this discussion is not related to the technical content and is
   irrelevant and confusing now. </li>
   <li>Update of affiliation of the editors. </li>
+  <li>Added RDF WG to the Acknowledgements section.</li>
 </ul>
 
 </section>