--- a/rdf-json/index.html	Wed Aug 28 17:21:10 2013 -0700
+++ b/rdf-json/index.html	Thu Aug 29 16:58:15 2013 +0100
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
     <script class='remove'>
       var respecConfig = {
           // specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
-          specStatus:           "ED",
+          specStatus:           "WG-NOTE",
           
           // the specification's short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
           shortName:            "rdf11-json",
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@
           // subtitle   :  "an excellent document",
 
          // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
-          publishDate:  "2013-08-21",
+          publishDate:  "2013-08-28",
 
           // if the specification's copyright date is a range of years, specify
           // the start date here:
-          copyrightStart: "2004",
+          copyrightStart: "2011",
 
           // if there is a previously published draft, uncomment this and set its YYYY-MM-DD date
           // and its maturity status
@@ -103,7 +103,10 @@
     <p>This document defines a textual syntax for RDF called RDF/JSON that 
     allows an RDF graph to be completely written in a form compatible
     with the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) [[!RFC4627]] and alternative
-    to the one recommended in [[JSON-LD]].</p>
+    to the one recommended in JSON-LD [[JSON-LD]].</p>
+    <p>The syntax defined in this document should not be used unless there is
+    a specific reason to do so. <b>Use of JSON-LD is
+    recommended</b>.</p>
 </section>
 
 
@@ -112,11 +115,13 @@
     Group</a> has decided not to push this document through the W3C
     Recommendation Track. You should therefore not expect to see this
     document eventually become a W3C Recommendation.</p>
-    <p>As of July 7, 2013 the <a href="https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-07-10#resolution_1">RDF WG decided to pursue the publication of this document as a W3C WG Note</a> to provide those who are using it and/or have an interest in it with a stable reference.</p>
+    <p>This document was published as a Working Group Note to provide those
+    who are using it and/or have an interest in it with a stable reference.</p>
     <p>The RDF Working Group decided to put <a
     href="http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/">JSON-LD</a> on the
-    Recommendation track (see <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-30#resolution_2">resolution of May 30, 2012</a>). Therefore, unless you have a specific reason to use this
-    document instead of JSON-LD, <b>you are encouraged to use JSON-LD</b>.</p>
+    Recommendation track. Therefore, unless you have a specific reason to use
+    the syntax defined in this document instead of JSON-LD, <b>you are
+    encouraged to use JSON-LD</b>.</p>
 </section>
 
 
@@ -124,9 +129,13 @@
     <h2>Introduction</h2>
 
     <p>This document defines RDF/JSON, a concrete syntax for RDF, as 
-    defined in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax 
-    [[!RDF11-CONCEPTS]], W3C Recommendation 
+    defined in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax W3C Recommendation 
+    [[!RDF11-CONCEPTS]], 
     in JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) [[!RFC4627]].</p>
+    <p>The syntax defined in this document is an alternative
+    to the one recommended in JSON-LD [[JSON-LD]]. It should not be
+    used unless there is a specific reason to do
+    so. <b>Use of JSON-LD is recommended</b>.</p>
 
 </section>