Fix names of references to RDF documents
authorPeter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:47:06 -0700
changeset 730 347803dcf165
parent 727 d90c0f35f0b6
child 731 6532d5839c19
Fix names of references to RDF documents
rdf-mt/index.html
--- a/rdf-mt/index.html	Wed Apr 03 09:21:05 2013 -0700
+++ b/rdf-mt/index.html	Wed Apr 03 10:47:06 2013 -0700
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@
 combine a string and an IRI identifying a datatype. A datatype is understood to define a partial mapping, called the <dfn>lexical-to-value mapping</dfn>, from character strings to values, and the literal refers to the value obtained by applying this mapping to the character string. If the mapping gives no value for the literal string, then the literal has no referent. The <dfn>value space</dfn> of a datatype is the range of the <a>lexical-to-value mapping</a>. Every literal with that type either refers to a value in the value space, or fails to refer at all. An  <dfn>ill-typed</dfn> literal is one whose datatype IRI is recognized, but whose character string is not in the domain of the datatype lexical-to-value mapping. Datatypes are indicated by IRIs.
 </p>
 
-<p> Interpretations will vary according to which IRIs they recognize as denoting datatypes. We describe this using a parameter D on interpretations. where D is a set of IRIs that constitute the recognized datatype IRIs. IRIs listed in <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130115/#xsd-datatypes">///Concepts Section 5///</a> MUST be interpreted as described there, and the IRI <code>rdf:plainLiteral</code> MUST be interpreted to refer to the datatype defined in [[!RDF-PLAIN-LITERAL]]. When other datatypes are used, the mapping between a recognized IRI and the datatype it refers to MUST be specified unambiguously, and be fixed during all RDF transformations or manipulations.</p> 
+<p> Interpretations will vary according to which IRIs they recognize as denoting datatypes. We describe this using a parameter D on interpretations. where D is a set of IRIs that constitute the recognized datatype IRIs. IRIs listed in <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130115/#xsd-datatypes">///Concepts Section 5///</a> MUST be interpreted as described there, and the IRI <code>rdf:plainLiteral</code> MUST be interpreted to refer to the datatype defined in [[!RDF-PLAINLITERAL]]. When other datatypes are used, the mapping between a recognized IRI and the datatype it refers to MUST be specified unambiguously, and be fixed during all RDF transformations or manipulations.</p> 
 
 <p>Language-tagged strings are an exceptional case which are given a special treatment. The IRI <code>rdf:langString</code> is classified as a datatype IRI, and interpreted to refer to a datatype, even though no L2V mapping is defined for it. The value space of <code>rdf:langString</code> is the set of all pairs of a string with a language tag. The semantics of literals with this as their type are given below. (If datatype L2V mappings were defined on pairs of lexical values rather than strings, then the L2V mapping for <code>rdf:langString</code> would be the identity function on pairs of the form &lt; unicode string, language tag &gt;. But as they are not, we simply list this as a special case.)</p>
 
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@
 
 </section>
 <section><h2>RDFS Interpretations and RDFS entailment</h2>
-<p>RDF Schema [[RDF-VOCABULARY]]
+<p>RDF Schema [[RDF-SCHEMA]]
   extends RDF to a larger <a id="defRDFSV"></a>vocabulary 
   with more complex semantic constraints:</p>