--- a/rdf-dataset/index.html	Mon Feb 17 12:07:54 2014 +0100
+++ b/rdf-dataset/index.html	Mon Feb 17 12:27:08 2014 +0100
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
           localBiblio: localBibliography,
 
           // specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
-          specStatus:           "FPWD",
+          specStatus:           "WG-NOTE",
+          errata:               "http://www.w3.org/2014/rdf1.1-errata",
 
          // the specification's short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
           shortName:            "rdf11-datasets",
@@ -21,7 +22,7 @@
           // subtitle   :  "an excellent document",
 
           // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
-          publishDate:  "2013-12-17",
+          publishDate:  "2014-02-25",
 
           // if the specification's copyright date is a range of years, specify
           // the start date here:
@@ -29,12 +30,12 @@
 
           // if there is a previously published draft, uncomment this and set its YYYY-MM-DD date
           // and its maturity status
-//          previousPublishDate:  "2004-02-10",
-//          previousMaturity:  "REC",
+          previousPublishDate:  "2013-12-17",
+          previousMaturity:  "WD",
 
           // if there a publicly available Editor's Draft, this is the link
 //
-          edDraftURI:           "https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-dataset/index.html",
+          // edDraftURI:           "https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-dataset/index.html",
 
           // if this is a LCWD, uncomment and set the end of its review period
           // lcEnd: "2009-08-05",
@@ -117,7 +118,9 @@
 </section>
 
 <section id="sotd">
-  <p>The RDF Working Group expects this document to become a Working Group Note.</p>
+  <p>The document is part of the RDF 1.1 document suite. The RDF
+  Working Group did not standardize the semantics of RDF
+  datasets. This note discusses issues in specifying such semantics. </p>
 </section>
 
 <section id="sec-introduction">