--- a/rdf-schema/index.html Mon Dec 02 17:26:47 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-schema/index.html Tue Dec 03 12:51:03 2013 +0100
@@ -340,11 +340,28 @@
href="#ch_class"><code>rdfs:Class</code></a>. Each instance of <code>rdfs:Datatype</code> is a <a href="#def-subclass">subclass</a> of rdfs:Literal.</p>
</section>
+
+<section id="ch_langString">
+<h3>rdf:langString</h3>
-<div class="issue">We should add the two new datatypes
- <code>rdf:HTML</code> and <code>rdf:langString</code>.
-</div>
-
+<p>The class <code>rdf:langString</code> is the class of <a
+href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-language-tagged-string">language-tagged string values</a>. <code>rdf:langString</code> is an instance of
+<code>rdfs:Datatype</code> and a <a href="#def-subclass">subclass</a> of <a
+href="#ch_literal"><code>rdfs:Literal</code></a>.</p>
+
+</section>
+
+<section id="ch_html">
+<h3>rdf:HTML</h3>
+
+<p>The class <code>rdf:HTML</code> is the class of <a
+href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html">HTML
+literal values</a>. <code>rdf:HTML</code> is an instance of
+<code>rdfs:Datatype</code> and a <a href="#def-subclass">subclass</a> of <a
+href="#ch_literal"><code>rdfs:Literal</code></a>.</p>
+
+</section>
+
<section id="ch_xmlliteral">
<h3>rdf:XMLLiteral</h3>
@@ -355,7 +372,6 @@
href="#ch_literal"><code>rdfs:Literal</code></a>.</p>
</section>
-
<section id="ch_property">
<h3>rdf:Property</h3>
@@ -1266,10 +1282,10 @@
the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/">RDF Core Working Group</a>
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#Membership">members</a>, and from
implementation feedback from many members of the <a
-href="http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/">RDF Interest Group</a>.The <a
-href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/">RDF Working Group</a> edited
-this document in 2013-14 to be in line with the RDF 1.1
-specifications. </p>
+href="http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/">RDF Interest Group</a>. In
+2013-2014 Guus Schreiber edited this document on behalf of the <a
+href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/">RDF Working Group</a>
+to bring it in line with the RDF 1.1 specifications. </p>
<p>David Singer of IBM was the chair of the original RDF Schema group
throughout most of the development of this specification; we thank David for
@@ -1323,9 +1339,13 @@
<li>Renamed the document from "RDF Vocabulary Description Language
1.0: RDF Schema" to "RDF Schema 1.1", as the term Vocabulary
Description Language has led to confusion.</li>
- <li>Four paragraphs of the Introduction were left out. These
+ <li>Three paragraphs of the Introduction were left out. These
paragraphs described the things that RDF Schema does not do and are
now much less relevant than in 2004. </li>
+ <li>Added the datatypes <code>rdf:langString</code> and
+ <code>rdf:HTML</code>. </li>
+ <li>Removed Appendix "RDF Schema in RDF/XML". It was informative,
+ but now out of date, in terms of content and in terms of syntax.</li>
</ul>
</section>
@@ -1376,6 +1396,8 @@
</section>
</section>
+<!--
+
<section class="appendix informative" id="ch_appendix_rdfs">
<h2>RDF Schema as RDF/XML</h2>
@@ -1653,6 +1675,7 @@
<hr />
</section>
+-->
</body>
</html>