--- a/rdf-primer/index.html	Mon Nov 11 23:20:27 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-primer/index.html	Mon Nov 11 23:40:52 2013 +0100
@@ -359,9 +359,9 @@
       to denote resources without explicitly naming them with an
       IRI.</p>
 
-      <p class="note">Blank nodes can kae RDF look very complicated,
-      especially when one consults details in the RDF Concepts
-      [[RDF11-CONCEPTS]] and RDF Semantics [[RDF11-MT]] document. It
+      <p class="note">Blank nodes can make RDF look very complicated,
+      especially when one consults details about blank nodes in the RDF Concepts
+      [[RDF11-CONCEPTS]] and RDF Semantics [[RDF11-MT]] documents. It
       should be noted that many RDF users survive without ever having
       to deal with blank nodes. </p> 
 
@@ -374,6 +374,9 @@
       <p>RDF provides a mechanism to group RDF statements in multiple
       graphs and associate each graph with an IRI.<p> 
 
+      >p class="issue">Suggest to ignore here the fact that in principle
+      a blank node can also be associated with a graph</p>
+
       <p>For example, the
       statements in the first example could be grouped in two
       graphs. A first graph could be provided by a social networking
@@ -386,6 +389,15 @@
         &lt;Bob&gt; &lt;is interested in&gt; &lt;the Mona Lisa&gt;.
       </pre>
 
+      <p class="note">The IIRI that is associated with the graph is
+      sometimes colloquially called the "graph name". In
+      practical RDF deployment the relation between the graph IRI and
+      the graph itself varies considrably and is not necessarily a
+      naming relation in the strict sense of the word. For this reason RDF 1.1
+      does not specify a particular semantics for the relation between
+      the "graph name" and the graph. See @@ for a more in-depth
+      discussion on this issue. </p>
+
       <p>A second graph could be provided by <a href="http://www.wikidata.org/">Wikidata</a>
       and identified by <code>https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/Q12418</code>:</p>