--- a/rdf-concepts/index.html Wed May 09 14:42:59 2012 -0400
+++ b/rdf-concepts/index.html Wed May 09 14:43:14 2012 -0400
@@ -260,6 +260,10 @@
RDF Schema can itself be used to define and document additional
RDF vocabularies. Some such vocabularies are mentioned in the
Primer [[RDF-PRIMER]].</p>
+
+ <p class="issue">It has been suggested that this specification should
+ also define terms such as “<dfn>namespace</dfn>”, “<dfn>namespace IRI</dfn>”,
+ and “<dfn>namespace prefix</dfn>”.</p>
</section>
@@ -296,16 +300,12 @@
<section id="conformance">
- Implementations are free to represent <a title="RDF graph">RDF graphs</a> in
- any other equivalent form. As an example: in an RDF graph,
- literals with datatype <tt><a>rdf:XMLLiteral</a></tt> can be represented
- in a non-canonical
- format, and canonicalization performed during the comparison between two
- such literals. In this example the comparisons may be
- being performed either between syntactic structures or
- between their denotations in the domain of discourse.
- Implementations that do not require any such comparisons can
- hence be optimized.</p>
+ <p>Implementations are free to represent <a title="RDF graph">RDF graphs</a> in
+ any other equivalent form.</p>
+
+ <p class="issue">This section needs to explain what kind of artefact
+ can conform to this specification, and what is required in order to
+ conform.</p>
</section>
@@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@
<h2>Changes from RDF 2004</h2>
<ul>
+ <li>2012-05-09: Removed an example from the conformance section that didn't make sense any more with the modified <code>rdf:XMLLiteral</code>. Added some new issue boxes.</li>
<li>2012-05-09: <code><a>rdf:XMLLiteral</a></code> no longer requires lexical forms to be canonicalized, and the value space is now defined in terms of [[DOM-LEVEL-3-CORE]] (<a href="https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/13">ISSUE-13</a>)</li>
<li>2012-05-09: Removed Section 3 <em>RDF Vocabulary IRI and Namespace</em>; its contents will be folded into the RDF Schema document</li>
<li>2012-05-02: Renamed “graph equivalence” to “<a>graph isomorphism</a>” (<a href="https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/86">ISSUE-86</a>)</li>