Implemented ACTION-326 re SPARQL RDF Datasets vs. RDF 1.1 RDF Datasets.
--- a/rdf-concepts/index.html Tue Dec 17 09:37:03 2013 -0800
+++ b/rdf-concepts/index.html Tue Dec 17 16:30:38 2013 -0500
@@ -819,9 +819,14 @@
can avoid interoperability issues by not ascribing importance to
the presence or absence of empty named graphs.</p>
- <p>Blank nodes as graph names are new. Existing SPARQL implementations
- might not accept this new feature for some time, so the use of blank
- nodes as graph names can cause interoperability problems.
+ <p>SPARQL 1.1 [[SPARQL11-OVERVIEW]] also defines the concept of an RDF
+ Dataset. The definition of an RDF Dataset in SPARQL 1.1 and this
+ specification differ slightly in that this specification allows RDF
+ Graphs to be identified using either an IRI or a blank node. SPARQL 1.1
+ Query Language only allows RDF Graphs to be identified using an IRI.
+ Existing SPARQL implementations might not allow blank nodes to be used
+ to identify RDF Graphs for some time, so their use can cause
+ interoperability problems.
<a href="#section-skolemization">Skolemizing</a> blank nodes used as
graph names can be used to overcome these interoperability problems.</p>
</div>