respec edits
authorGuus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:52:07 +0100
changeset 1569 f9def8f3d010
parent 1568 dd28f40c547e
child 1570 810a623eb93e
respec edits
rdf-new/index.html
--- a/rdf-new/index.html	Sun Dec 15 18:29:11 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-new/index.html	Sun Dec 15 20:52:07 2013 +0100
@@ -87,13 +87,11 @@
           // alternateFormats: [ { uri: "diff-<li>20130723.html", label: "diff to previous version" } ]
       };
     </script>
-
     <style type="text/css">
       figure { text-align: center; }
       table td, table th { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 0.2em 0.5em; }
     </style>
   </head>
-
 <body>
 
 <div class="head">
@@ -107,8 +105,8 @@
 	</section>
 
 <section id="sotd">
-  <p>The RDF Working Group  expects this document to become a Working
-  Group Note. </p>
+  The RDF Working Group  expects this document to become a Working
+  Group Note.
 </section>
 
 </div>
@@ -310,7 +308,7 @@
 				are minimally specified as of RDF
 				1.1. The Working Group published a
 				draft Note discussing issues related
-				to semantics for datasets [[RDF11-DATASETS]]</p>
+				to semantics of datasets [[RDF11-DATASETS]].</p>
 				
 			<p>RDF Graphs may be named using an IRI or a blank node.  RDF Graphs that are so named are
 				called named graphs.</p>
@@ -345,63 +343,72 @@
 
 <section id="section-serializations">
 
-    <h2>New Serialization Formats</h2>
+<h2>New Serialization Formats</h2>
 		
-		<p>RDF 1.1 introduces a number of new serialization formats. RDF 1.1 Concepts and
-			Abstract Syntax makes it clear that RDF/XML is no longer the only recommended serialization
-			format; RDF itself should be considered to be the data model (the abstract syntax), not any
-			particular serialization.</p>
+<p>RDF 1.1 introduces a number of new serialization formats. RDF 1.1 Concepts and
+Abstract Syntax makes it clear that RDF/XML is no longer the only recommended serialization
+format; RDF itself should be considered to be the data model (the
+abstract syntax), not any particular serialization.</p>
 
-		<figure>
-			<img width="717" height="370" src="serialization-formats.png">
-			<figcaption>RDF 1.0 and 1.1 serialization formats</figcaption>
-		</figure>
+<figure>
+  <img width="717" height="370" src="serialization-formats.png">
+  <figcaption>RDF 1.0 and 1.1 serialization formats</figcaption>
+</figure>
 		
 </section>
 
 <section id="section-semantics">
 
-    <h2>Semantics</h2>
+<h2>Semantics</h2>
 
-		<p>Most of the changes between RDF and RDF 1.1 do not have any effect on
-			implementations of entailment.</p>
+<p>Most of the changes between RDF and RDF 1.1 do not have any effect on
+implementations of entailment.</p>
 
-		<p>Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatypes,
-			replacing datatype maps in RDF 1.0 Semantics, but this does not have any
-			effect on implementation.</p>
+<p>Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatypes,
+replacing datatype maps in RDF 1.0 Semantics, but this does not have any
+effect on implementation.</p>
 		
-		<p>Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatype IRIs.
-			The RDF 1.0 Semantics used the concept of a datatype map: in the new semantic
-			description, this is the mapping from recognized IRIs to the datatypes they
-			identify. This change does not have any effect on implementation or semantic
-			entailments.</p>
+<p>Datatype entailment formally refers to a set of 'recognized' datatype IRIs.
+The RDF 1.0 Semantics used the concept of a datatype map: in the new semantic
+description, this is the mapping from recognized IRIs to the datatypes they
+identify. This change does not have any effect on implementation or semantic
+entailments.</p>
 
-		<p>RDF entailment has two required datatypes <code>xsd:string</code> and <code>rdf:langString</code>
-			which must be recognized, but this doesn't appreciably add to RDF
-			entailment as these two datatypes replace plain literals.</p>
+<p>RDF entailment has two required datatypes <code>xsd:string</code>
+and <code>rdf:langString</code> 
+which must be recognized, but this doesn't appreciably add to RDF
+entailment as these two datatypes replace plain literals.</p>
 
-		<p>One change that does affect entailment is that graphs containing invalid
-			literals (e.g., <code>"a"^^xsd:integer</code>) are immediately inconsistent for
-			recognized datatypes, even in sub-RDFS entailment regimes.</p>
+<p>One change that does affect entailment is that graphs containing invalid
+literals (e.g., <code>"a"^^xsd:integer</code>) are immediately inconsistent for
+recognized datatypes, even in sub-RDFS entailment regimes.</p>
 
-		<p>RDF 1.1 includes RDF Datasets. However, the semantics of RDF Datasets in
-			RDF 1.1 is minimal and entailment per se is only defined on RDF graphs so
-			there are no changes here.</p>
+<p>RDF 1.1 includes RDF Datasets. However, the semantics of RDF Datasets in
+RDF 1.1 is minimal and entailment per se is only defined on RDF graphs so
+there are no changes here.</p>
 
 </section>
 
 <section id="section-Acknowledgments" class="appendix">
 	
-    <h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
+<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
 
-		<p>The editor gratefully acknowledges the members of the RDF Working
-		Group who contributed to this document, including Richard Cyganiak,
-		Gavin Garothers, Pat Hayes, Sandro Hawke, Gregg Kellogg, Markus
-		Lanthaler, Peter Patel-Schneider, Eric Prud-hommeaux, Guus Schreiber
-		and Manu Sporny.
+<p>The editor gratefully acknowledges the members of the RDF Working
+Group who contributed to this document, including Richard Cyganiak,
+avin Garothers, Pat Hayes, Sandro Hawke, Gregg Kellogg, Markus
+Lanthaler, Peter Patel-Schneider, Eric Prud-hommeaux, Guus Schreiber
+and Manu Sporny.
 
-<p>The membership of the RDF Working Group included Thomas Baker, Scott Bauer, Dan Brickley, Gavin Carothers, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Olivier Corby, Richard Cyganiak, Souripriya Das, Ian Davis, Lee Feigenbaum, Fabien Gandon, Charles Greer, Alex Hall, Steve Harris, Sandro Hawke, Patrick Hayes, Ivan Herman, Nicholas Humfrey, Kingsley Idehen, Gregg Kellogg, Markus Lanthaler, Arnaud Le Hors, Peter Patel-Schneider, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Yves Raimond, Nathan Rixham, Guus Schreiber, Andy Seaborne, Manu Sporny, Thomas Steiner, Ted Thibodeau, Mischa Tuffield, William Waites, Jan Wielemaker, David Wood, Zhe Wu, and Antoine Zimmermann.</p>
-
+<p>The membership of the RDF Working Group included Thomas Baker,
+Scott Bauer, Dan Brickley, Gavin Carothers, Pierre-Antoine Champin,
+Olivier Corby, Richard Cyganiak, Souripriya Das, Ian Davis, Lee
+Feigenbaum, Fabien Gandon, Charles Greer, Alex Hall, Steve Harris,
+Sandro Hawke, Patrick Hayes, Ivan Herman, Nicholas Humfrey, Kingsley
+Idehen, Gregg Kellogg, Markus Lanthaler, Arnaud Le Hors, Peter
+Patel-Schneider, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Yves Raimond, Nathan Rixham, Guus
+Schreiber, Andy Seaborne, Manu Sporny, Thomas Steiner, Ted Thibodeau,
+Mischa Tuffield, William Waites, Jan Wielemaker, David Wood, Zhe Wu,
+and Antoine Zimmermann.</p> 
 
 </section>