--- a/rdf-schema/index.html	Thu Nov 14 01:12:19 2013 +0100
+++ b/rdf-schema/index.html	Thu Nov 14 12:55:19 2013 +0100
@@ -48,10 +48,10 @@
           // only "name" is required
           editors:  [
               { name: "Dan Brickley", url: "http://danbri.org/",
-                company: "", companyURL: "",
+                company: "Google", companyURL: "",
               }, 
               { name: "R.V. Guha",  url: "",
-                company: "", //companyURL: "",
+                company: "Google", //companyURL: "",
               },
           ],
           otherLinks: [
@@ -318,6 +318,10 @@
 
 </section>
 
+<div class="issue">We should add the two new datatypes
+  <code>rdf:HTML</code> and <code>rdf:langString</code>.
+</div>
+  
 <section id="ch_xmlliteral">
 <h3>rdf:XMLLiteral</h3>
 
@@ -814,6 +818,7 @@
 <section id="ch_reificationvocab"> 
 <h3>Reification Vocabulary</h3>
 
+<!--
 <p>@@ Check. The 1999 RDF Model and Syntax Specification [[RDFMS]] defined a 
 vocabulary for describing RDF statements without stating them. 
 The 2004 RDF specification did not assign a normative 
@@ -825,6 +830,7 @@
 href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/#reification">RDF
 2004 primer</a>.
 </p>
+-->
 
 <section id="ch_statement"> 
 <h4>rdf:Statement</h4>
@@ -1279,7 +1285,13 @@
   <li>Removed discussion about distinction between plain and typed
   literals, as this distinction is absent in RDF 1.1 and has no technical
   bearing on RDF Schema.</li>
-  <li>Fixed incorrect pointer to RDF Primer example 16 to example 21.</li>
+  <li>Fixed incorrect pointer to RDF Primer example 16 to example
+  21.</li>
+  <li>Removed the introductory paragraph of Sec. <a
+  href="ch_reificationvocab">"Reification Vocabulary"</a>, as
+  this discussion is not related to the technical content and is
+  irrelevant and confusing now. </li>
+  <li>Update of affiliation of the editors. </li>
 </ul>
 
 </section>