Changed to the standard ReSpec method of marking normative sections
authorRichard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Fri, 27 May 2011 11:06:22 +0100
changeset 21 987b2047c1fc
parent 20 cc3fb1e4ac5d
child 22 9827cdbf7c40
Changed to the standard ReSpec method of marking normative sections
index.html
--- a/index.html	Fri May 27 11:00:49 2011 +0100
+++ b/index.html	Fri May 27 11:06:22 2011 +0100
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
 
       <li>formal semantics [[!RDF-MT]], and</li>
 
-      <li>this document, (sections 4, 5, 6 and 7).</li>
+      <li>this document (sections 4, 5, 6 and 7).</li>
     </ul>
 
     <p class="issue">This document was written when RDF/XML was the
@@ -172,9 +172,6 @@
     it should be de-emphasized accordingly. There is no reason why
     it should be a normative reference in this document.</p>
 
-    <p>Within this document, normative sections are explicitly labelled as such. 
-Explicit notes are informative.</p>
-
     <p>The framework is designed so that vocabularies can be layered.  
 The RDF and RDF vocabulary definition (RDF schema) 
 languages 
@@ -187,7 +184,10 @@
 </section>
 
 
-<section id="section-Overview">
+<section id="conformance"></section>
+
+
+<section id="section-Overview" class="informative">
     <h2>Motivations and Goals</h2>
 
     <p class="issue">Does this section add value?</p>
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
 </section>
 
 
-<section id="section-Concepts">
+<section id="section-Concepts" class="informative">
     <h2>RDF Concepts</h2>
 
     <p class="issue">This section is quite redundant with later normative sections and the RDF Primer.</p>
@@ -669,17 +669,8 @@
 </section>
 
 
-<section id="section-conformance">
-    <h2>Conformance (Normative)</h2>
-
-    <p>In this specification, all sections not explicitly marked as normative are non-normative.</p>
-
-    <p>The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this specification are to be interpreted as described in [[!RFC2119]] where they appear in uppercase.</p>
-</section>
-
-
 <section id="section-URIspaces">
-    <h2>RDF Vocabulary URI and Namespace (Normative)</h2>
+    <h2>RDF Vocabulary URI and Namespace</h2>
 
     <p>
 
@@ -719,7 +710,7 @@
 
 
 <section name="section-Datatypes">
-   <h2>Datatypes (Normative)</h2>
+   <h2>Datatypes</h2>
 
     <p class="issue">This section perhaps should discuss
     <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#dtype_interp">the XSD datatype map</a>
@@ -904,7 +895,7 @@
 
 
 <section id="section-Graph-syntax">
-    <h2>Abstract Syntax (Normative)</h2>
+    <h2>Abstract Syntax</h2>
 
     <p>This section defines the RDF abstract syntax. The RDF abstract
     syntax is a set of triples, called the RDF graph.</p>
@@ -1295,7 +1286,7 @@
 </section>
 
 
-<section id="section-fragID">
+<section id="section-fragID" class="informative">
     <h2>Fragment Identifiers</h2>
 
     <p class="issue">This section does not address the case where RDF is
@@ -1355,7 +1346,7 @@
 </section>
 
 
-<section id="section-Acknowledgments">
+<section id="section-Acknowledgments" class="informative">
     <h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
 
     <p class="issue">This section does not yet list those who made
@@ -1554,7 +1545,7 @@
 </section>
 
 
-<section class="appendix" id="changes">
+<section class="appendix informative" id="changes">
   <h2>Changes from RDF 2004</h2>
 
   <ul>