Correction made to using from PatH
authorGavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:11:13 -0700
changeset 161 6e987bbde3fc
parent 160 7e8c8a4f3800
child 162 38eb943b676c
child 186 764a04fee877
Correction made to using from PatH
trig/index.html
--- a/trig/index.html	Tue Oct 18 16:58:06 2011 -0700
+++ b/trig/index.html	Wed Nov 02 11:11:13 2011 -0700
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
 				<p class="issue">This draft does NOT support N3 style graph literals.
 				That is, no <code>=</code> and no trailing <code>.</code></p>
 				
-				<p>A graph statement pairs an IRI with a RDF Graph. It is intended that triple statements made about that IRI are being made about the graph. The triple statements that make up the graph are enclosed in <code>{}</code>.</p>
+				<p>A graph statement pairs an IRI with a RDF Graph. It is intended that triple statements made using that IRI are being made about the graph. The triple statements that make up the graph are enclosed in <code>{}</code>.</p>
 
 				<p>In a TriG document a graph IRI MUST NOT be used to label more then one graph. The IRI of a graph statement may be omitted. In this case the graph is considered the default graph of the RDF Dataset.</p>
 
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
 				<p>All other terms and directives come from Turtle.</p>
 				<section id="terms-blanks-nodes">
 					<h4>Special Considerations for Blank Nodes</h4>
-					<p class="issue">BlankNodes being shared between graphs is unresolved.</p>
+					<p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/12">ISSUE-12</a> BlankNodes being shared between graphs is unresolved.</p>
 					<p>The formal semantics [[RDF-MT]] of RDF do not provide for the meaning of 
 					blank nodes between graphs. BlankNodes sharing the same label in different 
 					graph literals MUST not be considered to be the same BlankNode.</p>