--- a/model/ProvenanceModel.html	Mon Nov 28 14:51:49 2011 +0000
+++ b/model/ProvenanceModel.html	Tue Nov 29 08:51:20 2011 +0000
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@
 
 
 <p>
-The model includes a further additional elements: <a title="note record">notes</a>. These are also structured as sets of attribute-value pairs.  Notes are used to provide additional, "free-form" information regarding <em>any</em> identifiable construct of the model, with no prescribed meaning. The difference between attributes in notes attributes and the other attributes is further clarified <a href="#record-note">here</a>. 
+The model includes a further additional elements: <a title="note record">notes</a>. These are also structured as sets of attribute-value pairs.  Notes are used to provide additional, "free-form" information regarding <em>any</em> identifiable construct of the model, with no prescribed meaning. Notes are described in detail <a href="#record-note">here</a>. 
 </p>
    
 <p> 
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@
 its attributes are given a value as part of that assertion.
 </li>
 
-<li>Activities are not represented by entity records, but instead by actity records, as explained below.</li>
+<li>Activities are not represented by entity records, but instead by activity records, as explained below.</li>
 </ul>
 
 
@@ -1684,7 +1684,8 @@
 <span class="nonterminal">usageIdentifier</span>:=  <span class="nonterminal">identifier</span>
 </div>
 <div class="note">
-The grammar should make it clear that attribute <span class="name">prov:steps="1"</span> is required for imprecise-1-derivationRecord.
+The grammar should make it clear that attribute <span class="name">prov:steps="1"</span> is required for imprecise-1-derivationRecord.<br/>
+  PM: suggestion -- remove the distinction between imprecise-1 and imprecise-n in the grammar and instead explain that the qualification (1 vs n) is through attribute prov:steps.
 </div>
 
 <div class="anexample">