--- a/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl	Thu May 17 13:38:06 2012 -0400
+++ b/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl	Thu May 17 14:03:18 2012 -0400
@@ -57,22 +57,22 @@
     <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;definition">
         <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A definition quoted from PROV-DM or PROV-CONSTRAINTS that describes the concept expressed with this OWL term.</rdfs:comment>
     </owl:AnnotationProperty>
+    <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&rdfs;label">
+        <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"></rdfs:comment>
+    </owl:AnnotationProperty>
     <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;editorialNote">
         <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A note by the OWL development team about how this term expresses the PROV-DM concept, or how it should be used in context of semantic web or linked data.</rdfs:comment>
     </owl:AnnotationProperty>
-    <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&rdfs;label">
-        <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"></rdfs:comment>
-    </owl:AnnotationProperty>
     <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;inverse">
         <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">PROV-O does not define all property inverses. The directionalities defined in PROV-O should be given preference over those not defined. However, if users wish to name the inverse of a PROV-O property, the local name given by prov:inverse should be used.</rdfs:comment>
     </owl:AnnotationProperty>
     <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&rdfs;comment">
         <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"></rdfs:comment>
     </owl:AnnotationProperty>
+    <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&owl;versionInfo"/>
     <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&rdfs;seeAlso">
         <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"></rdfs:comment>
     </owl:AnnotationProperty>
-    <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&owl;versionInfo"/>
     <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;category">
         <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Classify prov-o terms into three categories, including &#39;starting-point&#39;, &#39;qualifed&#39;, and &#39;extended&#39;. This classification is used by the prov-o html document to gently introduce prov-o terms to its users. </rdfs:comment>
     </owl:AnnotationProperty>
@@ -802,6 +802,19 @@
     
 
 
+    <!-- http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value -->
+
+    <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&prov;value">
+        <prov:prov-dm-constraints></prov:prov-dm-constraints>
+        <prov:category>expanded</prov:category>
+        <prov:editorialNote>This property serves the same purpose as rdf:value, but has been reintroduced to avoid some of the definitional ambiguity in the RDF specification (specifically, &#39;may be used in describing structured values&#39;).</prov:editorialNote>
+        <prov:component>entities-activities</prov:component>
+        <prov:prov-dm>http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-attribute-value</prov:prov-dm>
+        <prov:prov-n></prov:prov-n>
+    </owl:ObjectProperty>
+    
+
+
     <!-- http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAssociatedWith -->
 
     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&prov;wasAssociatedWith">

--- a/ontology/prov.ttl	Thu May 17 13:38:06 2012 -0400
+++ b/ontology/prov.ttl	Thu May 17 14:03:18 2012 -0400
@@ -1037,6 +1037,15 @@
     prov:inverse "wasUsedBy" ;
     prov:qualifiedForm prov:Usage, prov:qualifiedUsage .
 
+prov:value
+    a owl:ObjectProperty ;
+    prov:category "expanded" ;
+    prov:component "entities-activities" ;
+    prov:editorialNote "This property serves the same purpose as rdf:value, but has been reintroduced to avoid some of the definitional ambiguity in the RDF specification (specifically, 'may be used in describing structured values')." ;
+    prov:prov-dm "http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-attribute-value" ;
+    prov:prov-dm-constraints "" ;
+    prov:prov-n "" .
+
 prov:wasAssociatedWith
     a owl:ObjectProperty ;
     rdfs:comment "An prov:Agent that had some (unspecified) responsibility for the occurrence of this prov:Activity."@en ;