--- a/model/ProvenanceModel.html	Mon Oct 10 15:09:38 2011 +0100
+++ b/model/ProvenanceModel.html	Mon Oct 10 16:52:19 2011 +0100
@@ -2496,7 +2496,7 @@
 </ul>
 
 
-<div class='note'>It is suggested that <span class="name">wasQuoteOf</span> is a strict sub-relation of <span class="name">wasEventuallyDerivedFrom</span>.
+<div class='note'>It is suggested that <span class="name">wasAttributedTo</span> is a strict sub-relation of <span class="name">wasEventuallyDerivedFrom</span>.
 It is not clear that it can be the case. Shouldn't <span class="name">ag</span> be used, and not controlling, for a derivation to hold? </div>
 </section>
 

--- a/model/simon-comments.txt	Mon Oct 10 15:09:38 2011 +0100
+++ b/model/simon-comments.txt	Mon Oct 10 16:52:19 2011 +0100
@@ -442,12 +442,13 @@
 >super-relations do not contain reference to any agents but the
 >sub-relations do. What does it mean?
 
-TODO: all section needs updating.
+
+Update as an implication
 
 
 >(T) Last sentence of 5.7.2.2: "wasQuoteOf" should be "wasAttributedTo"
 
-TODO
+Update (but is in a note for now)
 
 >
 >Thanks,