--- a/overview/prov-overview.html Wed Apr 10 11:04:03 2013 +0200
+++ b/overview/prov-overview.html Wed Apr 10 11:10:31 2013 +0200
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/#dfn-provenance">Provenance</a> is information about entities, activities, and people involved in producing a piece of data or thing, which can be used
to form assessments about its quality, reliability or trustworthiness. The goal of PROV is to enable the wide publication and interchange of provenance on the Web and other information systems. PROV enables one to represent and interchange provenance information using widely available formats such as RDF and XML. In addition, it provides definitions for accessing provenance information, validating it, and mapping to Dublin Core. When referring to PROV, we are referring to the entire family of documents.
<p>
-The design of PROV stems from the recommendations of the Provenance Incubator Group ([[PROV-XG]]) which performed an extensive information gathering process including use case cataloging, requirements elicitation and a literature survey. From this process, <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/XGR-prov-20101214/#Broad_Recommendations">8 broad recommendations were defined</a>. PROV support seven of the eight recommendations. Recommendation #2 was out of scope for standardization of activity of the working group, but it is believed that it can be supported by PROV extensibility points.
+The design of PROV stems from the recommendations of the Provenance Incubator Group ([[PROV-XG]]) which performed an extensive information gathering process including use case cataloging, requirements elicitation and a literature survey. From this process, <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/XGR-prov-20101214/#Broad_Recommendations">8 broad recommendations were defined</a>. <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#How_does_PROV_address_the_recommendations_of_the_Provenance_Incubator_Group">PROV supports seven of the eight recommendations.</a> Recommendation #2 was out of scope for standardization of activity of the working group, but it is believed that it can be supported by PROV extensibility points.
</p>
<p>