provo html tweaks
authorTim L <lebot@rpi.edu>
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:44:58 -0400
changeset 4098 bc1b30e53419
parent 4097 48db47fa4ffe
child 4099 603f62f9276b
provo html tweaks
ontology/prov-o-html-sections/description-qualified-terms.inc.html
--- a/ontology/prov-o-html-sections/description-qualified-terms.inc.html	Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012 -0400
+++ b/ontology/prov-o-html-sections/description-qualified-terms.inc.html	Tue Jul 17 11:44:58 2012 -0400
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
          </p>
 
          <p>
-            As can be seen in this example, qualifying an influence relation provides a second form (e.g. <code>:e1Gen</code>) to express an equivalent influence relation 
+            As can be seen in this example, qualifying an influence relation provides a second form (e.g. <code>:e1 prov:qualifiedGeneration :e1Gen</code>) to express an equivalent influence relation 
             (e.g. <code>:e1 prov:wasGeneratedBy :a1</code>).
             It is correct and acceptable for an implementer to use either qualified or unqualified forms as they choose (or both), 
             and a consuming application should be prepared to recognize either form.