removed prov:todo on prov:hadActivity, changed rdfs:comment to suit http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/367
--- a/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl Thu Apr 26 10:47:20 2012 -0400
+++ b/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl Thu Apr 26 11:01:03 2012 -0400
@@ -56,12 +56,12 @@
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;definition">
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A definition quoted from PROV-DM or PROV-CONSTRAINTS that describes the concept expressed with this OWL term.</rdfs:comment>
</owl:AnnotationProperty>
+ <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;editorialNote">
+ <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A note by the OWL development team about how this term expresses the PROV-DM concept, or how it should be used in context of semantic web or linked data.</rdfs:comment>
+ </owl:AnnotationProperty>
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&rdfs;label">
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"></rdfs:comment>
</owl:AnnotationProperty>
- <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;editorialNote">
- <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A note by the OWL development team about how this term expresses the PROV-DM concept, or how it should be used in context of semantic web or linked data.</rdfs:comment>
- </owl:AnnotationProperty>
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="&prov;inverse">
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">PROV-O does not define all property inverses. The directionalities defined in PROV-O should be given preference over those not defined. However, if users wish to name the inverse of a PROV-O property, the local name given by prov:inverse should be used.</rdfs:comment>
</owl:AnnotationProperty>
@@ -274,8 +274,7 @@
<rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;FunctionalProperty"/>
<prov:component>derivations</prov:component>
<prov:category>qualified</prov:category>
- <prov:todo>Relax domain so that Derivations and Responsibilities can reference an activity. http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/226</prov:todo>
- <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The activity generating the derived entity and using the derived-from entity.</rdfs:comment>
+ <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Optional: The Activity that is part of the Involvement, which used, generated, invalidated, or was the responsibility of some Entity.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="&prov;Activity"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&prov;Involvement"/>
<rdfs:domain>
@@ -309,9 +308,9 @@
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&prov;hadOriginalSource">
<prov:component>derivations</prov:component>
<prov:category>expanded</prov:category>
+ <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">An original source refers to the source material that is closest to the person, information, period, or idea being studied. An original source relation is a particular case of derivation that aims to give credit to the source that originated some information.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="&prov;Entity"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&prov;Entity"/>
- <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">An original source refers to the source material that is closest to the person, information, period, or idea being studied. An original source relation is a particular case of derivation that aims to give credit to the source that originated some information.</rdfs:comment>
<prov:qualifiedForm rdf:resource="&prov;Source"/>
<prov:qualifiedForm rdf:resource="&prov;qualifiedSource"/>
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&prov;wasDerivedFrom"/>