--- a/model/ProvenanceModel.html	Thu Oct 06 23:21:01 2011 +0100
+++ b/model/ProvenanceModel.html	Thu Oct 06 23:31:48 2011 +0100
@@ -1503,12 +1503,15 @@
 <div class='note'>We will allow wasComplementOf to be asserted between entities identified by qualified identifiers. This will allow us to express   wasComplementOf between entities asserted in separate accounts (potentially, with the same identifiers).
 </div>
 
-
-<div class='pending'>Mutual ivpOf each other should be agreed. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/29">ISSUE-29</a></div>
-
-<div class='pending'>Do we need a sameAsEntity relation. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/35">ISSUE-35</a></div>
-
-<div class='pending'>Is ivpOf transitive? This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/45">ISSUE-45</a></div>
+<div class='note'>It is suggested that the name 'wasComplementOf' does not capture the meaning of this relation adequately. No concrete suggestion has been made so far.
+Furthermore, there is a suggestion that an alternative relation that is transitive may also be useful.
+This is raised in the following <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Sep/0315.html">email</a>.</div>
+
+
+
+<div class='issue'>A discussion on alternative definition of wasComplementOf has not reached a satisfactory conclusion yet. This is <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/29">ISSUE-29</a></div>
+
+
 
 <div class='pending'> Comments on ivpof in <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/57">ISSUE-57</a>.</div>