Switch back to the ED template for the specs
authorMarkus Lanthaler <mark_lanthaler@gmx.net>
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:34:21 +0200
changeset 1893 8ff237dff16b
parent 1892 b4473de683b6
child 1894 931e4de7751d
Switch back to the ED template for the specs
spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html
spec/latest/json-ld/index.html
--- a/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html	Fri Aug 16 16:39:52 2013 +0200
+++ b/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html	Fri Aug 16 18:34:21 2013 +0200
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
 
       doRDFa: "1.1",
       // specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
-      specStatus:           "CR",
-      publishDate:          "2013-08-22",
+      specStatus:           "ED",
+      // publishDate:          "2013-08-22",
       // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
       //publishDate:          "2012-12-25",
       copyrightStart:       "2010",
--- a/spec/latest/json-ld/index.html	Fri Aug 16 16:39:52 2013 +0200
+++ b/spec/latest/json-ld/index.html	Fri Aug 16 18:34:21 2013 +0200
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
 
       doRDFa: "1.1",
       // specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
-      specStatus:           "CR",
+      specStatus:           "ED",
       // if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
-      publishDate:          "2013-08-22",
+      // publishDate:          "2013-08-22",
       copyrightStart:       "2010",
 
       // the specification's short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
@@ -175,11 +175,11 @@
   </ul>
 
   <p>
-    Before this specification may exit the Candidate Recommendation phase, 
-    at least two independent implementations must pass each test, 
-    although no single implementation must pass every test. The 
-    working group will decide when 
-    the test suite is of sufficient quality to test interoperability and 
+    Before this specification may exit the Candidate Recommendation phase,
+    at least two independent implementations must pass each test,
+    although no single implementation must pass every test. The
+    working group will decide when
+    the test suite is of sufficient quality to test interoperability and
     will produce an implementation report hosted together with the test suite.
   </p>
 
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@
     </pre>
 
     <p>The referenced context not only specifies how the terms map to
-      <tref title="IRI">IRIs</tref> in the Schema.org vocabulary but also 
+      <tref title="IRI">IRIs</tref> in the Schema.org vocabulary but also
       specifies that string values associated with
       the <code>homepage</code> and <code>image</code> property
       can be interpreted as an <tref>IRI</tref> (<code>"@type": "@id"</code>,
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@
     For the current status see
     <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON-LD_Features_at_Risk">features "at risk" in JSON-LD 1.0</a></p>
  <p>A number of JSON-LD document authors have been confused with the context
-  sensitivity of @type. When used in the context, it means 
+  sensitivity of @type. When used in the context, it means
   "coerce the string value associated with the term to the following datatype."
   When used in the body of a document in a JSON-LD object that represents a
   node in the graph, it means "the rdf:type of the subject identified by @id
@@ -1397,7 +1397,7 @@
   has led to confusion that may be easily remedied by reading a tutorial or
   the specification. It may also be that further modifications for declaring a
   datatype may be required, such as introducing a "@coerce" or "@literalType"
-  keyword. Implementors are asked to pay particular attention to the 
+  keyword. Implementors are asked to pay particular attention to the
   feature and provide feedback on alternative ways to express the functionality
   described above. The feature may remain in the specification as-is, or it may
   be modified heavily after further implementation experience has been gathered.
@@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@
     <tref href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-concrete-rdf-syntax">concrete RDF syntax</tref>
     as described in [[RDF11-CONCEPTS]]. Hence, a JSON-LD document is both an
     RDF document <em>and</em> a JSON document and correspondingly represents an
-    instance of an RDF data model. However, JSON-LD also extends the RDF data 
+    instance of an RDF data model. However, JSON-LD also extends the RDF data
     model to optionally allow JSON-LD to serialize
     <tref href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-generalized-rdf-dataset">Generalized RDF Datasets</tref>.
     The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are:</p>