--- a/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html Tue Aug 20 22:34:34 2013 +0200
+++ b/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html Tue Aug 20 22:47:27 2013 +0200
@@ -929,6 +929,23 @@
If <i>remote contexts</i> is not passed, it is initialized to an empty
<tref>array</tref>.</p>
+ <div class="issue atrisk" data-number="10" title="Support for @base: null ">
+ <p class="atrisk-head">Note: This feature is
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi">"at risk"</a> and may
+ be removed from this specification based on feedback. Please send feedback to
+ <a href="mailto:public-rdf-comments@w3.org">public-rdf-comments@w3.org</a>.
+ For the current status see
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON-LD_Features_at_Risk">features "at risk" in JSON-LD 1.0</a></p>
+ <p>Unlike many other serialization formats, JSON-LD allows to specify that
+ there is no base IRI from within the document (by setting <code>@base</code> to
+ <tref>null</tref>). The result is that the algorithm for establishing a base IRI
+ as specified in <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-5.1">RFC3986 section 5.1</a>
+ is overridden so relative IRIs remain relative IRIs even in the case that an IRI
+ would be available in one of the outer layers (e.g., the IRI used to retrieve
+ the document or an application supplied base IRI). Based on implementer feedback,
+ the Working Group may decide to remove this feature from JSON-LD 1.0.</p>
+ </div>
+
<ol class="algorithm">
<li>Initialize <i>result</i> to the result of cloning
<tref>active context</tref>.</li>
--- a/spec/latest/json-ld/index.html Tue Aug 20 22:34:34 2013 +0200
+++ b/spec/latest/json-ld/index.html Tue Aug 20 22:47:27 2013 +0200
@@ -957,7 +957,25 @@
<tref title="relative IRI">relative IRIs</tref> to be expanded to
<tref title="absolute IRI">absolute IRIs</tref>.</p>
- <p>Please note that the <code>@base</code> will be ignored if used in external contexts.</p>
+ <div class="issue atrisk" data-number="10" title="Support for @base: null ">
+ <p class="atrisk-head">Note: This feature is
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi">"at risk"</a> and may
+ be removed from this specification based on feedback. Please send feedback to
+ <a href="mailto:public-rdf-comments@w3.org">public-rdf-comments@w3.org</a>.
+ For the current status see
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON-LD_Features_at_Risk">features "at risk" in JSON-LD 1.0</a></p>
+ <p>Unlike many other serialization formats, JSON-LD allows to specify that
+ there is no base IRI from within the document (by setting <code>@base</code> to
+ <tref>null</tref>). The result is that the algorithm for establishing a base IRI
+ as specified in <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-5.1">RFC3986 section 5.1</a>
+ is overridden so relative IRIs remain relative IRIs even in the case that an IRI
+ would be available in one of the outer layers (e.g., the IRI used to retrieve
+ the document or an application supplied base IRI). Based on implementer feedback,
+ the Working Group may decide to remove this feature from JSON-LD 1.0.</p>
+ </div>
+
+ <p>Please note that the <code>@base</code> will be ignored if used in
+ external contexts.</p>
</section>
<section class="informative">