--- a/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html Sun Aug 11 23:07:12 2013 +0200
+++ b/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html Sun Aug 11 23:08:39 2013 +0200
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
doRDFa: "1.1",
// specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
- specStatus: "ED",
+ specStatus: "CR",
+ publishDate: "2013-08-22",
// if you wish the publication date to be other than today, set this
//publishDate: "2012-12-25",
copyrightStart: "2010",
@@ -23,9 +24,9 @@
// if there is a previously published draft, uncomment this and set its YYYY-MM-DD date
// and its maturity status
- previousPublishDate: "2013-04-11",
+ previousPublishDate: "2013-05-16",
previousMaturity: "LC",
- previousURI: "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-json-ld-api-20130411/",
+ previousURI: "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-json-ld-api-20130516/",
// if there a publicly available Editor's Draft, this is the link
edDraftURI: "http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html",
@@ -34,6 +35,7 @@
// if this is a LCWD, uncomment and set the end of its review period
// lcEnd: "2009-08-05",
+ crEnd: "2013-09-19",
// if you want to have extra CSS, append them to this list
// it is recommended that the respec.css stylesheet be kept
@@ -125,11 +127,11 @@
</section>
<section id="sotd">
- <p>This document has been under development for over 25 months in the
+ <p>This document has been under development for over 30 months in the
JSON for Linking Data Community Group. The document has recently been
transferred to the RDF Working Group for review, improvement, and publication
along the Recommendation track. The specification has undergone significant
- development, review, and changes during the course of the last 25 months.</p>
+ development, review, and changes during the course of the last 30 months.</p>
<p>There are several independent
<a href="http://json-ld.org/#impl">interoperable implementations</a> of
@@ -214,6 +216,12 @@
<li>Allow contexts to be passed into the API directly. Previously only context documents, i.e.,
objects having a <code>@context</code> member were allowed.</li>
</ul>
+
+ <p>Before this specification exits Candidate Recommendation, two or more
+ independent implementations must pass each test, although no single
+ implementation must pass each test. The working group will decide when
+ the test suite is of sufficient quality to test interoperability and will
+ produce an implementation report (hosted together with the test suite).</p>
</section>