Add link to ISSUE-114 also to the timestamped version of the syntax spec
authorMarkus Lanthaler <mark_lanthaler@gmx.net>
Tue, 22 May 2012 13:55:12 +0800
changeset 675 0ef6054610ca
parent 674 3ed90e003f2a
child 676 a141996335e7
Add link to ISSUE-114 also to the timestamped version of the syntax spec

There are some errors in the grammar section (e.g., @type in a value objects is just allowed to be an array with max. one entry). Instead of correcting them in a timestamped version I just included a link to the relevant issue.
spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/index.html
--- a/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/index.html	Tue May 22 13:44:30 2012 +0800
+++ b/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/index.html	Tue May 22 13:55:12 2012 +0800
@@ -2338,7 +2338,8 @@
 deterministically transform the author's markup into valid JSON-LD.</p>
 
 <p class="issue">The final nuanced details of the exact grammar are still being
-discussed, as well as the best mechanism to express these restrictions. EBNF
+discussed (see <a href="https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/114#issuecomment-5820544">ISSUE-114</a>),
+as well as the best mechanism to express these restrictions. EBNF
 seems like overkill since it's a subset of JSON. EBNF doesn't quite capture
 some of the more esoteric restrictions in the language.
 </p>