Added issue marker in authoring guidelines appendix that this should probably become a normative syntax specification, including EBNF. This relates to issue #135.
--- a/spec/latest/json-ld-syntax/index.html Sun Jun 24 18:55:44 2012 -0700
+++ b/spec/latest/json-ld-syntax/index.html Mon Jun 25 11:24:57 2012 -0700
@@ -2341,6 +2341,10 @@
For the time being, a simple list of plain english guidelines are provided.
</p>
+<p class="issue">Per
+ <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jun/0111.html">Andy S's comment</a>,
+ consider making this a normative syntax definition along with EBNF.</p>
+
<ol>
<li>A JSON-LD document is composed of a single <tref>subject definition</tref> or an <tref>array</tref> of <tref title="subject definition">subject definitions</tref>.</li>
<li>The value of <code>@id</code> MUST be a <tref>term</tref>, a <tref>compact IRI</tref>, or an <tref>IRI</tref>.</li>