removed the note in 2.2.2.3 for the html data guide, and changed its type to ig note.
--- a/html-data-guide/index.html Thu Mar 01 14:34:57 2012 -0800
+++ b/html-data-guide/index.html Fri Mar 02 17:28:19 2012 +0100
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
<script class='remove'>
var respecConfig = {
// specification status (e.g. WD, LCWD, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
- specStatus: "ED",
+ specStatus: "IG-NOTE",
charterDisclosureURI: "http://www.w3.org/2006/07/swig-charter#Ipr",
// the specification's short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@
// if the specification's copyright date is a range of years, specify
// the start date here:
- // copyrightStart: "2005"
+ copyrightStart: "2011",
// if there is a previously published draft, uncomment this and set its YYYY-MM-DD date
// and its maturity status
// previousPublishDate: "1977-03-15",
- // previousMaturity: "WD",
+ previousMaturity: "2012-01-12",
// if there a publicly available Editor's Draft, this is the link
edDraftURI: "https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/htmldata/raw-file/default/html-data-guide/index.html",
@@ -539,9 +539,6 @@
<li><code>@itemprop</code> + <code>@itemscope</code> = <code>@property</code> + an empty <code>@typeof</code> if there's no <code>@itemtype</code></li>
<li><code>@itemprop</code> otherwise = <code>@property</code></li>
</ul>
- <p class="issue">
- The guidance above does not adhere to the RDFa 1.1 Lite set of attributes, because of the use of the <code>@resource</code> attribute rather than the <code>@about</code> attribute. However, using <code>@resource</code> gives a more natural mapping when mixing RDFa and microdata within a page. See <a href="http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/119">ISSUE-119</a>.
- </p>
</section>
<section>