--- a/bp/index.html Thu May 02 18:22:33 2013 +0200
+++ b/bp/index.html Thu May 02 18:32:43 2013 +0200
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@
<!--<p class="todo"> To include: Phil suggests to include <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2012/07/conformance_for_vocabularies.html" target="_blank">Conformance for Vocabularies</a>.
</p> -->
+<section>
<h2>Conformance for Vocabularies</h2>
A data interchange, however that interchange occurs, is conformant with a vocabulary if:
@@ -198,9 +199,11 @@
</ul>
</section>
+</section>
<!-- Discovery Checklist -->
-<h3>Vocabulary Discovery Checklist</h3>
+<section>
+<h2>Vocabulary Discovery Checklist</h2>
<p>The following checklist is a guide to helping developers determine whether an existing vocabulary would be a reasonable candidate for use by a government authority.
</p>
@@ -229,9 +232,11 @@
<i>What it means:</i>Another way around is to perform search using the previously identified key terms in datasets catalogues. Some of these catalogues provide samples of how the underlying data was modelled and how it was used for.<br/><br/>
Some existing catalogues are: <a href="http://thedatahub.org/" target="_blank">Data Hub</a> (former CKAN), <a href="http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/" target="_blank">LOV</a> directory, etc.
</p>
+</section>
<!-- Discovery Checklist -->
-<h3>Using SKOS to Create a Controlled Vocabulary</h3>
+
+<h2>Using SKOS to Create a Controlled Vocabulary</h2>
<p class="todo"> (Editors) - Requested (12-Apr-2013, GLD WG F2F) - guidance on creating a simple controlled vocabulary using SKOS. Confirm this fits with the scope of BP document.
</p>
@@ -240,7 +245,8 @@
<p class="todo"> (Editors) - Update with attribution to Bernard Vatant's 5 Star Linked Data Vocabulary scheme (proposed).
</p>
-<h3>Is your Linked Data Vocabulary 5-star?</h3>
+<section>
+<h2>Is your Linked Data Vocabulary 5-star?</h2>
Inspired by the 5-star linked data scale <a href="http://5stardata.info/" target="_blank">5-Star Scheme</a>, suggestions on creating a 5-star vocabulary <a href="http://blog.hubjects.com/2012/02/is-your-linked-data-vocabulary-5-star_9588.html" target="_blank">REF4</a>.
<p class="highlight">☆ <b>Publish your vocabulary on the Web at a stable URI using an open license.</b>
@@ -257,12 +263,15 @@
<p class="highlight">☆☆☆☆☆ <b>Link to other vocabularies by re-using elements rather than re-inventing.</b>
</p>
+
+</section>
+
<!-- is your linked data vocabulary 5 star? >> -->
<!-- << Vocabulary Selection Criteria checklist -->
-
-<h3>Vocabulary Selection Criteria</h3>
+<section>
+<h2>Vocabulary Selection Criteria</h2>
This checklist aims to help in vocabulary selection, in summary:
<li>Ensure vocabularies you use are published by a trusted group or organization</li>
@@ -312,10 +321,12 @@
<i>What it means:</i> The publisher ideally will address compatibility of versions over time. Major changes to the vocabularies should be reflected on the documentation.
</p>
+</section>
<!-- << Vocabulary management/creation -->
-<h3>Vocabulary Creation</h3>
+<section>
+<h2>Vocabulary Creation</h2>
<!-- Editorial notes for creators/maintainers:
@@ -369,12 +380,14 @@
</p>
<!-- Vocabulary Creation -->
+</section>
<!-- TODO -->
<p class="todo">Add references to Felix Sasaka's work on multilingual Web and new W3C WG
-<h3>Multilingual Vocabularies</h3>
+<section>
+<h2>Multilingual Vocabularies</h2>
<p>
This section provides some considerations when we are dealing with multilingualism in vocabularies. We have identified that multilingualism in vocabularies can be found nowadays in the following formats:
</p>
@@ -385,9 +398,12 @@
<li>As a set of ontology + lexicon. This represents the latest trend in the representation of linguistic (multilingual) information associated to ontologies. The idea is that the ontology is associated to an external ontology of linguistic descriptions. One of the best exponents in this case is the lemon model <a href="http://tia2011.crim.fr/Workshop-Proceedings/pdf/TIAW15.pdf" target="_blank">REF1</a>, <a href="http://lexinfo.net/" target="_blank">REF2</a>, an ontology of linguistic descriptions that is to be related with the concepts and properties in an ontology to provide lexical, terminological, morphosintactic, etc., information. One of the main advantages of this approach is that semantics and linguistic information are kept separated. One can link several lemon models in different natural languages to the same ontology.</li>
</ul>
The current trend is to follow the first approach, i.e., to use rdfs:label and rdfs:comment for each term in the vocabulary.
+
+</section>
<!-- Multilingualism in vocabs >> -->
+<section>
</section> <!-- VOCABULARY SELECTION >> -->