--- a/tests/earl/RelyingPartyExample.n3	Sun Sep 25 01:00:06 2011 +0200
+++ b/tests/earl/RelyingPartyExample.n3	Mon Sep 26 01:01:40 2011 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
+@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
 @prefix cert: <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#> .
 @prefix rsa: <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/rsa#> .
 @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@@ -166,7 +168,11 @@
 	earl:result [ a earl:TestResult;
 		dct:description "";
 		earl:outcome earl:passed;
-		earl:pointer _:modulus  ]. #if there were two modulii would this be two pointers?
+#		earl:pointer _:modulus
+# At this point we don't know if we have a literal number. We could point to:
+#  - an other minigraph, the same way we do it for the public key
+#  - point to statements using rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, ...
+	]. 
 
 # Is the RSA modulus a literal number?
 # btw, failure here is not necessarily a deadly problem - as long as we allow the old notation.