--- a/tr.html	Fri Feb 14 22:02:31 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Fri Feb 14 22:06:41 2014 +0100
@@ -322,9 +322,9 @@
         Group, and do not imply any endorsement by W3C or its members beyond
         agreement to work on a general area of technology.</dd>
       <dt id="RecsCR">Candidate Recommendation (CR)</dt>
-      <dd class="changed">A Candidate Recommendation is a document that satisfies
-        the Working Group's technical requirements, and has already received
-        wide review. W3C publishes a Candidate Recommendation to
+      <dd class="changed">A Candidate Recommendation is a document that
+        satisfies the Working Group's technical requirements, and has already
+        received wide review. W3C publishes a Candidate Recommendation to
         <ul>
           <li>signal to the wider community that a final review should be done</li>
           <li>gather <a href="#implementation-experience">implementation
@@ -478,14 +478,13 @@
     <p>For example, inviting review of new or significantly revised sections
       published in Working Drafts, and tracking those comments and the Working
       Group's responses, is generally a good practice which would often be
-      considered positive evidence of wide review. A recommended practice is
-      making a specific announcement to other W3C Working Groups as well as the
-      general public, especially the sub-communities thereof that are affected
-      by this specification, that a group proposes to enter Candidate
-      Recommendation in e.g. approximately four weeks. By contrast a generic
-      statement in a document requesting review at any time is likely not to be
-      considered as sufficient evidence that the group has solicited wide
-      review. </p>
+      considered positive evidence of wide review. Working Groups <span class="rfc2119">should</span>
+      announce to other W3C Working Groups as well as the general public,
+      especially those affected by this specification, a proposal to enter
+      Candidate Recommendation in e.g. approximately four weeks. By contrast a
+      generic statement in a document requesting review at any time is likely
+      not to be considered as sufficient evidence that the group has solicited
+      wide review. </p>
     <p>A Working Group could present evidence that wide review has been
       received, irrespective of solicitation. But it is important to note that
       receiving many detailed reviews is not necessarily the same as wide