--- a/tr.html Wed Mar 19 12:58:56 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html Wed Mar 19 13:00:59 2014 +0100
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@
<h1>W3C Process Document</h1>
<h2 id="Reports">7 W3C Technical Report Development Process</h2>
<p>The W3C technical report development process is the set of steps and
- requirements followed by W3C <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/groups#GroupsWG">Working
+ requirements followed by W3C <a href="groups#GroupsWG">Working
Groups</a> to standardize Web technology. The W3C technical report
development process is designed to </p>
<ul>
<li>support multiple specification development methodologies</li>
- <li>maximize <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-consensus"
+ <li>maximize <a href="policies.html#def-consensus"
rel="glossary" title="Definition of Consensus"><span class="dfn-instance">consensus</span></a>
about the content of stable technical reports</li>
<li>ensure high technical and editorial quality</li>
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
</ul>
<p>See also the licensing goals for W3C Recommendations in <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Licensing">section
2</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
</p>
<h3>Table of Contents</h3>
<ul id="mozToc">
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
in maturity level, requiring a Working Group to conduct further work, and
<em class="rfc2119">may</em> require the specification to return to a
lower <a href="#maturity-level">maturity level</a>. The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
- inform the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ inform the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a> and Working Group Chairs when a Working Group's request
for a specification to advance in maturity level is declined and the
specification is returned to a Working Group for further work.</p>
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
</dd>
<dd class="new"><strong>Note:</strong> Candidate Recommendation is the
state referred to in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
as "Last Call Working Draft"</dd>
<dd><strong>Note:</strong> Candidate Recommendations are expected to be
acceptable as Recommendations. Announcement of a different next step <em
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
longer endorses. See also clause 10 of the licensing requirements for
W3C Recommendations in <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Requirements">section
5</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</dd>
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</dd>
</dl>
<p>Working Groups and Interest Groups <em class="rfc2119">may</em> make
available "Editor's drafts". Editor's drafts have no official standing
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
Reports</h4>
<p>Every document published as part of the technical report development
process <em class="rfc2119 old">must</em> be a public document. The <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/">index
- of W3C technical reports</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-doc-list">PUB11</a>]
+ of W3C technical reports</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-doc-list">PUB11</a>]
is available at the W3C Web site. W3C strives to make archival documents
indefinitely available at their original address in their original form.</p>
<p>Every document published as part of the technical report development
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
and the Advisory Committee of any changes to these rules.</p>
<p>The primary language for W3C Technical Reports is English. W3C encourages
the translation of its Technical Reports. <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Translation/">Information
- about translations of W3C technical reports</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-translations">PUB18</a>]
+ about translations of W3C technical reports</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-translations">PUB18</a>]
is available at the W3C Web site.</p>
<h4 id="transition-reqs">7.2.2 Advancement on the Recommendation Track</h4>
<p>For <em>all</em> requests to advance a specification to a new maturity
@@ -317,11 +317,11 @@
<li><em class="rfc2119 ">must</em> provide public documentation of all <a
href="#substantive-change">substantive changes</a> to the technical
report since the previous publication.</li>
- <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+ <li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
address</a> all issues raised about the document since the previous
maturity level.</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> provide public documentation of any <a
- href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#FormalObjection">Formal
+ href="policies.html#FormalObjection">Formal
Objections</a>.</li>
<li><span class="rfc2119">should</span> provide public documentation of
changes that are not substantive.</li>
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
ensure the requirements have been met before Director's approval is given.</p>
<h4 id="doc-reviews">7.2.3 Reviews and Review Responsibilities</h4>
<p>A document is available for review from the moment it is first published.
- Working Groups <em class="rfc2119">should</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+ Working Groups <em class="rfc2119">should</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
address</a> <em>any</em> substantive review comment about a technical
report in a timely manner. </p>
Reviewers <em class="rfc2119">should</em> send substantive technical
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@
<p>Publishing the First Public Working Draft triggers a Call for Exclusions,
per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</p>
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</p>
<h4 id="revised-wd">7.3.2 Revising Public Working Drafts</h4>
<p>A Working Group <em class="rfc2119">should</em> publish a Working Draft
to the W3C Technical Reports page when there have been significant changes
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@
<p>Work on a technical report <em class="rfc2119">may</em> cease at any
time. Work <em class="rfc2119 new">should</em> cease if W3C or a Working
Group determines that it cannot productively carry the work any further.
- If the Director <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/groups.html#GeneralTermination">closes
+ If the Director <a href="groups.html#GeneralTermination">closes
a Working Group</a> W3C <em class="rfc2119">must </em> publish any
unfinished specifications on the Recommendation track as <a href="#Note">Working
Group Notes</a>. If a Working group decides, or the Director requires,
@@ -519,11 +519,11 @@
begin an Advisory Committee Review of the specification.</p>
<p> A Candidate Recommendation corresponds to a "Last Call Working Draft" as
used in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
Publishing a Candidate Recommendation triggers a Call for Exclusions, per
<a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</p>
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</p>
<p>Possible next steps:</p>
<ul>
<li>Return to <a href="#hb-wd">Working Draft</a></li>
@@ -532,10 +532,10 @@
next step)</li>
<li><a href="#Note">Working Group Note</a></li>
</ul>
- <p>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
+ <p>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent"
rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a> to
- the Working Group decision to request advancement <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
- Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
+ the Working Group decision to request advancement <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
<h4 id="revised-cr">7.4.1 Revising a Candidate Recommendation</h4>
<p>If there are any <a href="#substantive-change">substantive changes</a>
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@
Recommendation. This is because substantive changes will generally require
a new Exclusion Opportunity per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
Note that approval is <em>expected</em> to be fairly simple compared to
getting approval for a transition to Candidate Recommendation.</p>
<p>In addition the Working Group:</p>
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
Proposed Recommendation and <em class="rfc2119">should</em> be at least
10 days after the end of the last Exclusion Opportunity per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</li>
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>A Working Group:</p>
<ul>
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that all issues raised during the
Candidate Recommendation review period other than by Advisory Committee
representatives acting in their formal AC representative role have been
- <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+ <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
addressed</a>,</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must </em>identify any substantive issues raised
since the close of the Candidate Recommendation review period by parties
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@
<p>The Director:</p>
<ul>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication of a Proposed
- Recommendation to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ Recommendation to the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a>, and</li>
<li><span><em class="rfc2119">may</em> approve a Proposed Recommendation
with minimal implementation experience where there is a compelling
@@ -639,17 +639,17 @@
<li>A Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must not</em> include any
substantive changes from the Proposed Recommendation on which it is
based.</li>
- <li>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
+ <li>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent"
rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
in Advisory Committee reviews, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C and the general
- public, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+ public, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
address</a> the comment at least 14 days before publication as a W3C
- Recommendation. In this case the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
- Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
+ Recommendation. In this case the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
the decision,</li>
<li>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication
- of a W3C Recommendation to <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ of a W3C Recommendation to <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a>, other W3C groups and to the public.</li>
</ul>
<p>Possible next steps:</p>
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@
level the specification had before publication as a Note</li>
</ul>
<p>The <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C Patent
- Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
+ Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
does not specify any licensing requirements or commitments for Working
Group Notes.</p>
<h3 id="rec-rescind">7.9 Rescinding a W3C Recommendation</h3>
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@
if the Recommendation contains many errors that conflict with a later
version or if W3C discovers burdensome patent claims that affect
implementers and cannot be resolved; see the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
- Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
+ Patent Policy</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
and in particular <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Requirements">section
5</a> (bullet 10) and <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-PAG-conclude">section
7.5</a>. A Working Group <em class="rfc2119">may</em> request the
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@
</ul>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the proposal to
rescind a W3C Recommendation to other W3C groups, the public, and the <a
- href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a>. The announcement <em class="rfc2119">must</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>indicate that this is a Proposal to Rescind a Recommendation</li>
@@ -784,13 +784,13 @@
Working Groups;</li>
<li>solicit public review.</li>
</ul>
- <p>If there was any <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#def-Dissent"
+ <p>If there was any <a href="policies.html#def-Dissent"
rel="glossary" title="Definition of Dissent"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
in Advisory Committee reviews, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C <strong>and the
- public</strong>, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+ public</strong>, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a href="policies.html#formal-address">formally
address</a> the comment at least 14 days before publication as a
- Rescinded Recommendation. In this case the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
+ Rescinded Recommendation. In this case the <a href="organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
the decision.</p>
<p> A Rescinded Recommendation <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be published
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@
Organize a Recommendation Track Transition"</a> in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Guide/">Member
guide</a> for practical information about preparing for the reviews and
announcements of the various steps, and <a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/05/rec-tips">tips
- on getting to Recommendation faster</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-rec-tips">PUB27</a>].</p>
+ on getting to Recommendation faster</a> [<a href="refs.html#ref-rec-tips">PUB27</a>].</p>
<div class="noprint">
<div class="navbar"><map name="navbar-bottom" title="Navigation Bar" id="navbar-bottom">
<hr>
@@ -811,5 +811,6 @@
</map>
</div>
</div>
+
</body>
</html>