--- a/tr.html Tue Dec 03 22:46:26 2013 +0100
+++ b/tr.html Tue Dec 03 23:04:46 2013 +0100
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
together. Some of the requirements are therefore enforced earlier in
the process.</li>
<li>Proposed Recommendation is no longer a separate step. Advisory
- Committee review now begins at the same time as Last Call Candidate
+ Committee review now begins at the same time as Candidate
recommendation, and ends 4 weeks after the Working group has
provisional approval for a Request to publish as a W3C
Recommendation.</li>
@@ -201,12 +201,12 @@
<li><a href="#revised-wd">7.4.1.b Revised Public Working Drafts</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
- <li><a href="#last-call">7.4.2 Last Call Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#last-call">7.4.2 Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
<li><a href="#rec-publication">7.4.3 Publication of a W3C
Recommendation</a>
<ul>
- <li><a href="#lcrec-publication">7.4.3.a Publishing a Last Call
- Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#lcrec-publication">7.4.3.a Publishing a Candidate
+ Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></li>
<li><a href="#rec-edited">7.4.3.b Publishing an Edited
Recommendation</a></li>
<li><a href="#for-all-recs">7.4.3.c For all W3C Recommendations</a></li>
@@ -284,12 +284,10 @@
Working Drafts do not necessarily represent a consensus of the Working
Group, and do not imply any endorsement by W3C or its members beyond
agreement to work on a general area of technology.</dd>
- <dt><a name="RecsCR" id="RecsCR">Last Call Candidate Recommendation
- (LC/CR)</a></dt>
- <dd class="changed">A Last Call Candidate Recommendation is a document
- that Satisfies the Working Group's technical requirements, and has
- already received wide review. W3C publishes a Last Call Candidate
- Recommendation to
+ <dt><a name="RecsCR" id="RecsCR">Candidate Recommendation (CR)</a></dt>
+ <dd class="changed">A Candidate Recommendation is a document that
+ Satisfies the Working Group's technical requirements, and has already
+ received wide review. W3C publishes a Candidate Recommendation to
<ul>
<li>signal to the wider community that a final review should be done</li>
<li>gather <a href="#implementation-experience">implementation
@@ -299,14 +297,14 @@
returned to the Working Group for further work, or abandoned. </li>
</ul>
</dd>
- <dd class="new"><strong>Note:</strong> Last Call Candidate Recommendation
- is the state referred to in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
+ <dd class="new"><strong>Note:</strong> Candidate Recommendation is the
+ state referred to in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>]
as "Last Call Working Draft"</dd>
- <dd><strong>Note:</strong> Last Call Candidate Recommendations will
- normally be accepted as Recommendations. Announcement of a different
- next step <em class="rfc2119">should</em> include the reasons why the
- change in expectations comes at so late a stage.</dd>
+ <dd><strong>Note:</strong> Candidate Recommendations will normally be
+ accepted as Recommendations. Announcement of a different next step <em
+ class="rfc2119">should</em> include the reasons why the change in
+ expectations comes at so late a stage.</dd>
<dt><a name="RecsW3C" id="RecsW3C">W3C Recommendation (REC)</a></dt>
<dd>A W3C Recommendation is a specification or set of normative guidelines
that, after extensive consensus-building, has received the endorsement
@@ -390,11 +388,10 @@
Group's responses, is generally a good practice which would often be
considered positive evidence of wide review. A recommended practice is
making a specific announcement to other W3C Working Groups as well as the
- general public that a group proposes to enter Last Call Candidate
- Recommendation in e.g. approximately four weeks. By contrast a generic
- statement in a document requesting review at any time is likely not to be
- considered as sufficient evidence that the group has solicited wide
- review. </p>
+ general public that a group proposes to enter Candidate Recommendation in
+ e.g. approximately four weeks. By contrast a generic statement in a
+ document requesting review at any time is likely not to be considered as
+ sufficient evidence that the group has solicited wide review. </p>
<p>A Working Group could present evidence that wide review has been
received, irrespective of solicitation. But it is important to note that
receiving many detailed reviews is not necessarily the same as wide
@@ -446,8 +443,7 @@
<li><a href="#first-wd">Publication of the First Public Working Draft</a>,</li>
<li><a href="#hb-wd">Publication of zero or more revised Public Working
Drafts</a>.</li>
- <li><a href="#last-call">Publication of a Last Call Candidate
- Recommendation</a>.</li>
+ <li><a href="#last-call">Publication of a Candidate Recommendation</a>.</li>
<li><a href="#rec-publication">Publication as a Recommendation</a>.</li>
<li>Possibly, <a href="#rec-edited">Publication as an Edited
Recommendation</a></li>
@@ -515,14 +511,12 @@
<p>Possible next steps:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#hb-wd">Revised Public Working Draft</a></li>
- <li><a href="#last-call">Last Call Candidate recommendation</a>.</li>
+ <li><a href="#last-call">Candidate recommendation</a>.</li>
<li><a href="#tr-end">Working Group Note</a></li>
</ul>
- <h4>7.4.2 <a name="last-call" id="last-call">Last Call Candidate
- Recommendation </a></h4>
- <p>To publish a Last Call Candidate recommendation, in addition to meeting
- the <a href="#transition-reqs">general requirements for advancement</a> a
- Working Group</p>
+ <h4>7.4.2 <a name="last-call" id="last-call">Candidate Recommendation </a></h4>
+ <p>To publish a Candidate recommendation, in addition to meeting the <a href="#transition-reqs">general
+ requirements for advancement</a> a Working Group</p>
<ul>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the specification has met all
Working Group requirements, or explain why the requirements have changed
@@ -534,48 +528,47 @@
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> specify the deadline for comments, which
<em class="rfc2119">must</em> be at least four weeks after publication,
and <em class="rfc2119">should</em> be longer for complex documents,</li>
- <li>If the document has previously been published as a Last Call Candidate
+ <li>If the document has previously been published as a Candidate
Recommendation, <em class="rfc2119">must</em> document the changes
- since the previous Last Call Candidate Recommendation, </li>
+ since the previous Candidate Recommendation, </li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the specification has received
<a href="#wide-review">wide review</a>, and</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> identify features in the document that
are considered "at risk". These features <em class="rfc2119">may</em>
be removed before advancement to Recommendation without a requirement to
- publish a new Last Call Candidate Recommendation.</li>
+ publish a new Candidate Recommendation.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication of a
- Last Call Candidate Recommendation to other W3C groups and to the public.
- </p>
- <p> A Last Call Candidate Recommendation corresponds to a "Last Call Working
- Draft" as used in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
+ Candidate Recommendation to other W3C groups and to the public. </p>
+ <p> A Candidate Recommendation corresponds to a "Last Call Working Draft" as
+ used in the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].
- Publishing a Last Call Candidate Recommendation triggers a Call for
- Exclusions, per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
+ Publishing a Candidate Recommendation triggers a Call for Exclusions, per
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/#sec-Exclusion">section
4</a> of the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy">W3C
Patent Policy</a> [<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/refs.html#ref-patentpolicy">PUB33</a>].</p>
<p>Possible next steps:</p>
<ul>
<li>Return to <a href="#hb-wd">Working Draft</a></li>
- <li>Return to <a href="#last-call">Last Call Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
+ <li>Return to <a href="#last-call">Candidate Recommendation</a></li>
<li><a href="#rec-publication">Request Recommendation status</a> (The
expected next step)</li>
<li><a href="#tr-end">Working Group Note</a></li>
</ul>
<p>If there are any <a href="#substantive-change">substantive changes</a>
- made to a Last Call Candidate Recommendation other than to remove features
+ made to a Candidate Recommendation other than to remove features
explicitly identified as "at risk", the Working Group <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
- repeat the full process of publication as a Last Call Candidate
- Recommendation before the Working Group can request Recommendation status.</p>
+ repeat the full process of publication as a Candidate Recommendation
+ before the Working Group can request Recommendation status.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#AC">Advisory
Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/acreview.html#ACAppeal">appeal</a>
the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
<h4>7.4.3 <a name="rec-publication" id="rec-publication">Publication of a
W3C Recommendation</a></h4>
- <h5><a name="lcrec-publication" id="lcrec-publication">Publishing a Last
- Call Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></h5>
- <p>To publish a Last Call Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation,
- a Working Group</p>
+ <h5><a name="lcrec-publication" id="lcrec-publication">Publishing a
+ Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation</a></h5>
+ <p>To publish a Candidate Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation, a Working
+ Group</p>
<ul>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> republish the document, identifying it
as the basis of a Request for Recommendation,</li>
@@ -584,26 +577,26 @@
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that the document has received <a
href="#wide-review">wide review,</a></li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> show that all issues raised during the
- Last Call Candidate Recommendation review period have been <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
+ Candidate Recommendation review period have been <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address">formally
addressed</a>,</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must </em>identify any substantive issues raised
since the close of the review period by parties other than Advisory
Committee representatives,</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> document how the testing and
- implementation requirements identified as part of the transition to Last
- Call Candidate Recommendation have been met,</li>
+ implementation requirements identified as part of the transition to
+ Candidate Recommendation have been met,</li>
<li><em class="rfc2119">must</em> identify where errata are tracked, and</li>
- <li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> remove features identified in the Last
- Call Candidate Recommendation document as "at risk" without repeating
- the transition to Last Call Candidate Recommendation.</li>
+ <li><em class="rfc2119">may</em> remove features identified in the
+ Candidate Recommendation document as "at risk" without repeating the
+ transition to Candidate Recommendation.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Director</p>
<ul>
<li><span><em class="rfc2119">should not</em> provisionally approve a
Request for publication of a W3C Recommendation less than 35 days
- after the publication of the Last Call Candidate Recommendation on
- which is it based [editor's note - this is to allow for the patent
- policy exclusion period to expire], and<br>
+ after the publication of the Candidate Recommendation on which is it
+ based [editor's note - this is to allow for the patent policy
+ exclusion period to expire], and<br>
</span></li>
<li><span><em class="rfc2119">may</em> provisionally approve a
Recommendation with minimal implementation experience where there is a