Edited Recommendations no longer need AC review for only editorial changes.
https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152
--- a/cover.html Mon Oct 10 03:24:09 2016 +0200
+++ b/cover.html Mon Oct 10 03:33:13 2016 +0200
@@ -2288,11 +2288,13 @@
<p>A Working group <em class="rfc2119">may</em> request republication of a Recommendation, or W3C
<em class="rfc2119">may</em> republish a Recommendation, to make corrections that do not result in any changes to the
text of the specification.</p>
+
<p><a href="#editorial-change">Editorial changes</a> to a Recommendation require no technical review of the proposed changes.
A Working Group, provided there are no votes against the resolution to publish <em class="rfc2119">may</em> request
- publication of a <a href="#rec-pr">Proposed Recommendation</a> or W3C <em class="rfc2119">may</em> publish a
- <a href="#rec-pr">Proposed Recommendation</a> to make this class of change without passing through earlier maturity levels.
+ publication of a <a href="#rec-publication">Recommendation</a> or W3C <em class="rfc2119">may</em> publish a
+ <a href="#rec-publication">Recommendation</a> to make this class of change without passing through earlier maturity levels.
Such publications are called <dfn>Proposed Edited Recommendation</dfn>s.</p>
+
<p>To make corrections to a Recommendation that produce <a href="#substantive-change">substantive changes</a> but do not
add new features, or where there were votes against publishing the corrections directly as a
<a href="#rec-pr">Proposed Recommendation</a>, a Working Group <em class="rfc2119">may</em> request publication of a