--- a/tr.html	Mon Jan 20 00:45:59 2014 +0100
+++ b/tr.html	Mon Jan 20 00:56:13 2014 +0100
@@ -437,10 +437,12 @@
       Group's responses, is generally a good practice which would often be
       considered positive evidence of wide review. A recommended practice is
       making a specific announcement to other W3C Working Groups as well as the
-      general public that a group proposes to enter Candidate Recommendation in
-      e.g. approximately four weeks. By contrast a generic statement in a
-      document requesting review at any time is likely not to be considered as
-      sufficient evidence that the group has solicited wide review. </p>
+      general public, especially the sub-communities thereof that are affected
+      by this specification, that a group proposes to enter Candidate
+      Recommendation in e.g. approximately four weeks. By contrast a generic
+      statement in a document requesting review at any time is likely not to be
+      considered as sufficient evidence that the group has solicited wide
+      review. </p>
     <p>A Working Group could present evidence that wide review has been
       received, irrespective of solicitation. But it is important to note that
       receiving many detailed reviews is not necessarily the same as wide