Editorial things I had forgotten twice :( Thanks David for picking them up, and David for picking up that I had missed them.
--- a/cover.html Sat Dec 24 00:58:22 2016 +0100
+++ b/cover.html Sat Dec 24 21:49:55 2016 +0100
@@ -2079,6 +2079,7 @@
</ul>
<p>The Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication of a revised Candidate Recommendation to
other W3C groups and the Public.</p>
+
<h3 id="rec-pr">6.5 Proposed Recommendation</h3>
<p>In addition to meeting the <a href="#transition-reqs">general requirements for advancement</a>,</p>
<ul>
@@ -2121,6 +2122,9 @@
<li><a href="#rec-publication">Recommendation status</a> (The expected next step)</li>
<li><a href="#Note">Working Group Note</a></li>
</ul>
+ <p><a href="#AC">Advisory Committee</a> representatives <em class="rfc2119">may</em> initiate an
+ <a href="#ACAppeal">Advisory Committee Appeal</a> of the decision to advance the technical report.</p>
+
<h3 id="rec-publication">6.6 W3C Recommendation</h3>
<p>The decision to advance a document to Recommendation is a <a href="#def-w3c-decision">W3C Decision</a>.</p>
<p>In addition to meeting the <a href="#transition-reqs">general requirements for advancement</a>,</p>
@@ -2466,7 +2470,7 @@
</ul>
<p>If there was any <a href="#def-Dissent" rel="glossary"><span class="dfn-instance">dissent</span></a>
- in Advisory Committee reviews, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish the substantive content of
+ in the Advisory Committee review, the Director <em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish the substantive content of
the dissent to W3C <strong>and the public</strong>, and <em class="rfc2119">must</em>
<a href="#formal-address">formally address</a> the dissent at least 14 days before publication as an
Obsolete or Rescinded Recommendation.</p>